Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

dazza1639

Members
  • Posts

    1,127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

109 Excellent

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Location
    Manchester

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks everyone, I am really nervous now about using DFO, even though they said they could do it by Christmas or New Year. Which even without seeing the reviews, I thought it was optimistic. I have also contacted Rother Valley, they said the earliest they could book it in was Mid Jan or Feb. They would need to consult the workshop and get me a price and date. This again makes me a little nervous. But as they are only in Sheffield its not too far for me to drop off & collect.
  2. I'm looking for a bit of advice, I have an original Skywatcher EQ8 sat in my observatory and it is starting to show its age after 8 years. Guiding has always performed brilliantly with an RMS of around 0.5". However, of the last month or so, the guiding performance seems to have dropped of a cliff, RMS averaging 1.6". The stars still look pretty round but subs keep getting aborted as i get guiding spikes that are taking it over the 2.5" guide limit. I have, in the past, adjusted the dec & ra worm gears but i think it may be time for a thorough service by a professional who can take the time to do it properly and do a full strip, regrease and perhaps upgrade the worm gears & bearings. I was looking at the stellardrive upgrade by darkframe optics, however, I do not appear to be getting a respone to my emails. I have also seen some pretty negative reviews as well as some really positive ones. Is there any alternative to Dark Frame or are they still the best option?
  3. Version 2, this time I have used Starnet++ to process the nebula independently to the stars. Again the processing has been done in Affinity Photo.
  4. I’ve had a quick play with this in Affinity Photo. I will give it a proper go later.
  5. When you launch it, you should get a dialogue box saying there is a newer version available.
  6. Updated👍 I like that we can now enter x & y values for more accurate curves. Maybe someone will create arcsinh curve presets 🤞
  7. Mark Now that version 1.9 of Affinity Photo has been released it is possible to place points on a curve as x & y values between 0 & 1. Would it be possible to create arcsinh preset curves in Affinity Photo? Regards Darren
  8. What a stunning image
  9. There is no need to keep PS2 if it is just for combining the mono images into a colour image, if you watch my video you will see how easy it is.
  10. To make the process a little clearer I have recorded a quick video showing how I combine mono images to create a colour image using Affinity Photo. https://youtu.be/MBZ5W5YKVg4 The images in this video are just single 5 minute subs taken with Red, Green & Blue filters, that have been aligned using Astro Pixel Processor and saved as Tiff files. I hope it helps.
  11. The method I use is to paste each of my mono images into a new document as a layer, then use the colour channel adjustment layer on each of the new layers to colour them as either red, green or blue. I have set up presets for each colour to make it quick and easy. Then you just set the blend mode to add for each of the layers. This produces a colour image, if you then create a stamp layer that combines all the visible layers (ctrl, alt, shift & E) this creates a colour layer that you can further process. A good video to watch about colour is this explains splitting a colour image into each channel and recombining as used in my method. this video explains how to user the colour channel mixer
  12. I had another go at processing the Horsehead from the same dodgy data. Is it an improvement? Darren
  13. Due to the bad weather and having no new data to play with, I have dug out some of my early astro imaging efforts. I wasn't expecting much as the source data is really bad. The RGB data was taken with an stick Canon EOS 1000d through my C8 with a 0.63 FR. Now the focal reducer I used at the time was one of the dodgy Chinese knock offs that means that the back focus was all wrong creating misshaped stars towards the edges and really bad vignetting, most of which has been cropped out because of the size of my Ha data. The Ha data was my first every attempt at Ha when I first got my AtikOne 6.0. So the Ha data has issues as well. The Ha was taken using the same scope and focal reducer set up as above, so is suffering from the same issues as the RGB. But it also has the additional problem of being slightly out of focus, so some stars are little donuts. From the above, you would think why bother, so did I, but I really wanted to try some new techniques and try to combine data from different sources and image scales. I am just starting to get used to Astro Pixel Processor, Starnet++ and Affinity Photo so thought that this would be a real test. It was, I stacked the Ha & RGB files in APP so that the resulting files where same size and orientation, I also used the batch crop and rotate tools to get the framing I wanted, and to cut out as much of the crud as possible. I also used the background / light pollution removal tools before moving the two files (RGB & Ha), on to Starnet++ where I created starless versions of each. I then did the rest of the processing in Affinity Photo. Its not the best image I have ever produced, but from such bad data I am quite pleased. I suppose the moral of the story is never throw away any data, however bad. Thanks Darren
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.