Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

AdeKing

Members
  • Posts

    1,813
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AdeKing

  1. 3 hours ago, Stephenstargazer said:

    Yes I posted stuff about case here:

    https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/351419-show-us-your-berlebach-product/?do=findComment&comment=4052835

    Got it at WEX and thought it was better value than the Berlebach offering. You would need a shorter one of course, browse the lighting set cases.

    Thanks for the details  @Stephenstargazer I've added one to my Wex wish list. 

    Looking at the internal dimensions, it looks like my Uni 18 will fit in complete with the 8" iOptron pillar attached, which is a good thing as it's a right pain to separate the two.

    Roll on next PayDay.

    Ade

    • Like 1
  2. On 05/04/2021 at 12:19, Stephenstargazer said:

    With @Telescope40 et al, I think the AZ100 with DSC and no motors on UNi 28 provides a very good solution for visual observers up to moderate scope sizes not requiring a counterbalance. This keeps the set up portable at home and transportable, with no more than what you need.Nice to be free of batteries wires and chargers too. Of course it will also cope with larger or multiple scopes too which makes it very flexible as an only mount. Though at present I am keeping a go to equatorial on pier at home, that could become redundant?

    The complete FC100, Rowan, Berlebach  kit in just 4 parts goes in my car boot with room left for  clothes and coats etc. (Gives me a choice of sites as home is a best for SE to SW sky, partners place good for N, E, W.)

    IMG_20210405_120337.jpg

    That does look like a relatively compact setup.  I'm hoping for the same when I eventually click Buy.

    I have a Uni 18 that I will use initially and am I'm pleased to hear that you're happy with it on the Uni 28, which is the same, just taller.

    I also intend to keep an EQ on a pillar mount in the garden for the time being but hope to eventually leave the AZ100 semi-permanently mounted on a Tri-Pier in the garden and dust detach it when I want to observe remotely when I'll use the Uni 18.

    That is a nice looking bag for the UNI 28, can I ask where you sourced it as I am looking for something like that for my Uni 18.

    Ade

    • Like 1
  3. 19 hours ago, HollyHound said:

    The Uni 28 legs are 72mm wide by 35mm thick.

    I have double clamps on mine, which probably helps with rigidity, as it feels very solid, although I would say that my iOptron Tri Pier (which is rated for higher load), feels like it’s concreted into the floor and I suspect the Planet is the same 👍

    Good to hear that the iOptron Tri-Pier is nice and solid. I've been deliberating between a Planet and a Tri-Pier for my setup.

    I've already got a Uni 18 configured for an AZ Pro so have ordered an adaptor so that I can attach the AZ100 when I finally click buy.

    However, although I desperately want a Planet, because I intend to leave the AZ100 permanently setup in the garden I'll eventually get a Tri-Pier as I don't think I could bring myself to leave a beautiful Planet tripod set up permanently outside even if it was protected.

    • Like 3
  4. 1 minute ago, johninderby said:

    The Baader can use any T2 nosepieces and eyepiece holders so it can be configured to take 2” eyepieces or 1.25” ones.

    I use a 2” nosepiece on mine so I don't need to use a 1.25” to 2”:adaptor in the focuser but use a 1.25” eyepiece holder. 

    B0B29DCC-73F4-4C3D-9E4F-4EA944143C89.jpeg

    I do the same as John, 2" Nosepiece on the scope side and 1.25" on the eyepiece side but Baader do sell the basic 32mm prism diagonal complete with 1.25" nosepiece and 1.25" helical focusing eyepiece holder as well as the bare prism John linked to above.

    https://www.baader-planetarium.co.uk/shop/baader-t-2-90-zenith-prism-diagonal-with-32mm-prism-t-2-part-14/

    • Like 1
  5. The nice DPD guy dropped off a couple of Oklop carry bags of one for my ED120 and the other for my Altair 102 f/11.

    As I find that I use the size and bulk of the flight cases for these two OTAs as an excuse for not using them, I thought I'd get padded carry cases to reduce the bulk and remove the chance to use that particular excuse.

    Sadly, the bag for the 102 f/11 is a bit tight with the CNC tube rings attached and looks like it probably won't accommodate a handle even with the slimmer and lighter Skywatcher 102mm tube rings, but I haven't tried it yet so I'll keep my fingers crossed.

    Apart from the slightly tight dimensions I'm very happy with the quality and think they'll do what I wanted them to do.

    IMG_20210406_123637.thumb.jpg.b5ab9ceb4ae4d534c0acdc9650722d70.jpg

    • Like 11
  6. I tried for this on 19th March but wasn't 100% sure I'd seen it using an 80mm scope.

    However, tonight I put out the 8" Dob and hunted down M52 then used the chart in @davhei post above to confirm that I'd actually seen it.

    Very pleased to say that I definitely saw it tonight and am now pretty confident that I also saw it back in March.

    Pleased to have seen this, thanks to @JeremyS for the heads up and to everyone else for the helpful pointers in this thread.

    Ade

     

     

     

    • Like 9
  7. 23 minutes ago, Steve Clay said:

    Indeed. I have a solar finder and normally use my solarquest. Hoping to put the quark in the Ed 120. I saw Derek's answer about what would be possible with the motors.

    I'm in a dilemma whether go take the plunge for full DSC or just encoders and wait for motors. 1st world problems .

    Steve 

    Ah, I see your dilemma, good luck with making your decision.

    I've decided to go for the Nexus DSC and encoders as at some point I'll get encoders fitted to the Dob

  8. 14 minutes ago, johninderby said:

    I no longer use any of those SolSearcher or similar ones any more. Now I just use a solar filter on my RACI finder. So much better and easier to use. 👍🏻

    96C3E9B3-766A-4875-BE14-B3C975DF4D0F.jpeg

    In my case too much chance of me forgetting to out the filter on so am playing it safe.

  9. After selling loads of stuff I'm rapidly approaching the point where I can finally order an AZ100 and am getting excited.

    It's taken me a while but the effort it's taken to raise funds will mean that I appreciate it more.

    I've been deliberating what tripod to use/buy for a while.

    But as I already have a Uni18 with an iOptron top plate and pillar extension that I use for my AZ Pro I am thinking that I'll get an iOptron Tri-Pier adaptor for an EQ5/EQ6 so I can use the AZ100 on it rather than spending ££££ on a New Planet tripod which was the original plan.

    Now I've made the tripod decision I'm considerably closer to my target than I thought so will probably place my order in May/June.

    I'll be going for the mount, encoders, Nexus DSC and a dual saddle setup and can't wait.

    Very much looking forward to becoming a member of the AZ100 owners club.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
  10. I managed to get a rushed look at lunchtime though the seeing was terrible.

    I could see the new and unclassified region but try as I might seeing wasn't good enough to pick up the other two areas (and before you say it no, the sun wasn't behind the netball hoop and net in our neighbours garden). 😂

    IMG_20210309_140206.thumb.jpg.bff70136a9f76dad54a3208306900f17.jpg

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  11. @Alan White uses the same Nexus DSC handset sold with the AZ100 but has an encoder set and fitting kit specific to his OO UK 10" Newtonian, a great system but not exactly cheap.

    Cheaper options for that system are the Nexus or Nexus II controllers that don't have a handset and use SkySafari on a smartphone to select targets and see where the scope is pointing.

    Omegon also do a cheaper DSC system that @johninderby linked to the other day but I can't find it at the moment.  

    • Like 1
  12. On 28/02/2021 at 06:41, Aquavit said:

    I have considered a wifi mount, either the SW AZ Gti or, for more capacity, the iOptron AZ Pro.

    On paper I prefer the idea of these to a full goto and would run the Gti from an iPhone whereas the iOptron does come with a handset, but one issue that immediately crops up is that neither mount can be firmware updated via a MacBook so that's made them more or less unviable for me. These two reports add further doubts, it seems more hassle than just using a simple manual AZ mount and the human eye, depending on the visibility or otherwise of the targets you're aiming for of course.

    I have both the SW AZ Gti and the iOptron AZ Pro mounts as well as a selection of manual and goto Alt AZ and EQ Mounts and I love both the AZ GTi and AZ Pro mounts.  

    I have had issues with connecting the SW AZ Gti to SkySafari on my Huawei P20 (which I hate), but I believe that this to be a phone specific issue to do with aggressive power saving settings, as I have no problems connecting the same mount to SkySafari using an old iPhone 6 and have had fewer issues since I've found where the Huawei power saving settings are hidden away and have turned them off for the Synscan App and SkySafari.

    The AZ Pro on the other hand has worked faultlessly with SkySafari over WiFi since I got it and I love it. 

    As with all Alt AZ GoTo mounts the AZ Pro needs to be carefully levelled and balanced, but last night the AZ Pro put every single target I threw at it near the centre of the FOV of a 24mm eyepiece after completing its auto alignment routine and centring the mount chosen alignment star in the FOV.  I was jumping all over the sky last night so did not restrict viewing to the area of the alignment star and had no problems whatsoever.  However, like all mounts it does struggle when the battery starts to run low so remembering to recharge it is important. 

    The software buttons on the Synscan App and on SkySafari are a bit of a pain, but I add some of these to the glass screen protector on my phone to give me tactile buttons that I can find and press without needing to keep looking at the screen.  These are non-permanent and easily removed with a fingernail and retained on the original backing paper for future use.

    Hope this helps,

    Ade

  13. I was luck enough to see it from my back garden in Poole last night.  Was just recording observations of the Double Cluster in SkySafari when a bright flash caught my eye. First thought it was the local hoons letting off fireworks but no associated noise.

    I thought it was heading NNE with clear fragmentation and a visible trail and quite slow, in meteor terms anyway. 

    Orange in colour and seemed to disappear somewhere in Cepheus for me but I couldn't see very many stars low down to the north thanks to LP and the full moon.  

    Time was about 21:54UT according to my frantically scribbled notes.

    • Like 1
  14. There was a tatty Telepod with a metal tripod for sale on ENS recently that I toyed with the idea of purchasing, but opinions suggested it was best with small diameter short tube scopes and I decided that it wouldn't offer anything that my existing Manfrotto 393 head didn't already do.

    Interesting to hear that you found the heavier duty Gibraltar mount underwhelming too @John.  I have often pondered over the usefulness of these types of mounts for scopes.

     

    • Like 1
  15. 3 hours ago, Grumpy Martian said:

    Cloudy just now at 7 30.p.m. I know. But there were some breaks in this cloud cover to observe the Moon. So putting the glass of Prosecco to restI set up the 80 mm Equinox on my small table top Dobsonian mount.

    20210219_193221.jpg

    20210219_193143.jpg

    20210219_193135.jpg

    That tabletop dob mount looks a pretty good match for the Equinox 80 Martin.

    How do you find it in use?

    I've been thinking about one for the ZS66 for a while.

  16. A new-to-me Manfrotto 405 geared 3-way head after some minor Dremel surgery to convert it to a 2-way head a la @johninderby.

    IMG_20210217_203639.thumb.jpg.73d25f607975d8e985a0204f4c008049.jpg

    I've been after one of these for a while and managed to pick this one up off MPB.com.

    In really nice condition and looked pretty much unused.

    Hoping to get a chance to use it soon.

    The altitude sticker on the side is looking worse for wear since I removed it to convert it to 2-way but it is easily replaced though expensive at £8 per sticker plus P&P.

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.