Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

PlanetGazer

Members
  • Content Count

    237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

28 Excellent

3 Followers

About PlanetGazer

  • Rank
    Star Forming

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Arabia
  1. Currently Looking at the ones you mentioned here, also found these much cheaper ones: https://www.365astronomy.com/32mm-SWA-Super-Wide-Angle-Eyepiece-70-degree-2-inch.html definitely they would not match the quality of the above, but how much is the compromise?
  2. I'm considering both, part of the list of comparision. Noted, thanks for the advice! you are tempting me more towards the 20mm, also thank you for the advice. Thanks. Sorry all for the late replies, I wanted to read all advice with a clear mind. After reading all, I shifted my search to the right eye pieces, but i'm afraid I fell in a new rabbit hole, there are other options that came up, so still undecided, I will update with my final choices before I buy
  3. Planning to add a 2" EP to my collection as I have a SW 250P (10 inch) and want something special for DSOs and would love to capture the range of Andromeda in a gaze, so angle would be important . I'm thinking of the range between 35mm to 50mm. Budget is not a limit, though I would prefer to have an EP reasonably priced if available. I regularly use the 25mm standard plossl that came with the scope, which is doing more than ok. I have a 32mm and 16mm classical plossl, but don't use it much as it's hard to use with eyeglasses. I was thinking of the Explore Scientific 52° 40mm, but then I realized it's only 52 degrees and other reviews say that the brand is planetary focused. I was also looking at the televues, but should I make the crazy jump? I wouldn't mind much cheaper EP that have a little less performance that I wouldn't notice anyway at my current level, or is it worth it now? Thanks in advance! Edit:typo
  4. a question that I have been wondering about lately, though, only looking for short exposure only, as I use my dob usually for visual. But would love to take a couple of short exposure pictures. Wonder if the Canon EOS 4000D (NIS) is any good for astrophotography? Also, Nikon COOLPIX B500, found it on sale
  5. That's a great price! I did find similar car jump starters, but they are either small cheaply made lithium batteries, which is a safety concern for me; or a lead acid battery that's over priced (equivalent to £ 100 after discount link). So maybe buying a proper safe lithium battery with double the life-span (theoretically), could be the best value.
  6. I do need a power tank as most of my observing sessions are remote. I live in a flat with restricted outdoor space. the power tank is expensive, but the cheapest available power tank that can be shipped to my location. Regarding voltage, the manufacturer states it has a " 4* 12V DC for car powered device under 60W" which I think means 4 outlets that you can connect to a cable with negative car socket adapter. The mains outlets are 2 and are 120V AC (300 Watt Surge)
  7. I tried buying the SW or Celestron power tanks from multiple sites, US and UK. but non would ship internationally. For safety reasons
  8. What do you guys think of this power station. I would buy one for my current telescope or any other in the future. Reason I'm thinking of this one, as it's the only site that'll ship internationally. https://www.rockpals.com/collections/portable-power-station/products/250-watt-portable-generator-rechargeable-solar-generator-with-110v-ac-outlet https://www.amazon.com/Rockpals-250-Watt-Generator-Rechargeable-Emergency/dp/B075SSMR6K
  9. lots of good tips and advise in this post, which helped me. Thank you! No problems at all 3 Amps for mains power seems fine so far, 4 Amps could be next on my list, though mobile batteries are my priority now Trust me I have lost more, and kept my patience in many xD but glad that I gained knowledge in a new area (power and electricity) This was also helpful, I've never went back to the battery and decided to try a working car battery first, before buying a dedicated one. Thank you! I'm considering a 17 Ah or larger. Can't find a shop that will ship to me, due to safety regulations. Though I may just end up buying a separate car battery Impressive battery! I've bought a value voltmeter for the long run. I will start to learn how to use it. I have used the default accessories for the initial trials until I got it aligned and then used different accessories but were similar weight and did not find any major problems. regarding set up options, all were correct, I double checked with the amazing Synscan init 2.0 app as well. and yes I was excited! I found that the scope takes the longer angle to rotate sometimes, and the the cables get extended to the limit. to remedy that, I locate the object on the sky map, manually rotate the scope to the direction of the object (with the handset directional buttons) then use the GoTo to locate the object, this will make the scope not turn more than 180 degrees and will contribute to saving power. They have, but I'm much happier now xD Thanks for the help Ron This is good advise. the use of up and right as final steps to align, do contribute to the accuracy of the allignment
  10. Update : I would like to thank everyone for their contribution in this topic. I have finally managed to sort it out. As many have suggested, power was the issue, and I have managed to solve it. Sorry for the late reply, but finding the right time for an observing session + weather + debugging the issue, all contributed for the late reply. I have planned to test 2 methods: 1- Use mains power 2- try car socket battery power. Which meant I had to find some power supply cable and an extinction cord for the cigarette socket to position the scope an appropriate distance away from the car, to keep all sides visible. 1- I found 2 power supplies with 2 Amp 12 V (Mains power), tried them and both didn't align the scope correctly . I managed to find a power supply with 3 Amp 12 V and with multiple tries on different nights I finally managed to get the stars aligned with acceptable accuracy. As long as the target is anywhere in the 25mm EP view, I'm pleased. Boy was I happy when I managed to view Uranus for the first time! Not an easy target 2- So after I managed to align successfully using mains power, I had to insure that my scope works well when using batteries, since I ,mostly, stargaze outside my home. I tried using a working car battery via an interior cigarette socket, using the original cable that came with the scope, connected to an extension cord I bought. I manged to get an alignment that was one nudge away from target ( I might have been able to align more accurately if I tried again), though this was good enough for me to start the session and this time I went for Neptune! very small even in a 5mm EP, which was pushing the limit of my skies at that night. I have also enjoyed the views of a couple of DSOs. My next mission now is finding the ideal battery for my use! I would like to thank this community for helping me solve my problem and for keeping this hobby live and enjoyable!
  11. From my experience, I learned so much about the sky from trying to align the GOTO than my manual EQ scope. Note that aligning the GOTO scope is not a straight forward task for a complete beginner, you would have to learn the bright stars and their positions in the sky with a map/app to align your scope to it. It requires patience in the first sessions. + it's an Alt-Az mount, so you can push it manually any time. A manual scope, however, would force you to learn more of the sky extensively on the long run. Also, an equatorial manual scope will require you learning Right ascension-declination grid to set-up your mount, the scope doesn't move in an upright motion on an equatorial mount If you ask me, a manual EQ scope is a good choice early on on the hobby. If you consider the GOTO, I would recommend that you search more on how to use GOTOs before buying it, hopefully it will lead to an informative decision. Edit: just noted that the scope you bought has an EQ1 mount, note that both EQ1 and EQ2 are note that sturdy.
  12. nice picture there! This could be of topic, but I wonder how you clean such a big a mirror? Clear Skies
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.