-
Posts
1,732 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Jiggy 67
-
Sky-Watcher at the Yangtze River Delta Star Party
Jiggy 67 replied to FLO's topic in Sponsor Announcements and Offers
Nice but you’d need a flatbed to get half of that to your local star party!! 🤣 -
Order In Which To View Objects During a session
Jiggy 67 replied to Jiggy 67's topic in Observing - Discussion
Nothing like “old school “ is there John….you could probably find a fly on the dark side of Europa, but the rest of us need a little help!! 🤣🤣 -
Order In Which To View Objects During a session
Jiggy 67 replied to Jiggy 67's topic in Observing - Discussion
Exactly the reason for my original post. Don’t add over slewing into the mix!! 😩 As I’m using a reflector, not only do I have to think about the order of observing but also where the eyepiece is going to end up after slewing!! -
Like the rest of us, it will be an uphill struggle for the rest of your life.......but it's great fun struggling uphill so ask away!! Enjoy
-
Order In Which To View Objects During a session
Jiggy 67 replied to Jiggy 67's topic in Observing - Discussion
@Stu That's pretty simple, I take it the green is telling you the optimal time to observe?? -
Order In Which To View Objects During a session
Jiggy 67 replied to Jiggy 67's topic in Observing - Discussion
Absolutely...theres nothing worse than going to bed having failed on your last couple of targets. -
Order In Which To View Objects During a session
Jiggy 67 replied to Jiggy 67's topic in Observing - Discussion
It's amazing what happens when you mention Scotch Whisky! -
Order In Which To View Objects During a session
Jiggy 67 replied to Jiggy 67's topic in Observing - Discussion
Thanks @Stu.....luckily, I am also IOS only!...I will have a look at that app. I was already thinking that it's best to order objects as per "set" as that will cover everything that comes before the "set" time...I'm thinking "set" will come first, followed by "transit" and then "rise".........sometimes you just need someone to confirm your thinking. -
Hi all, Been away for a while due to work commitments and such like, in fact i'm ashamed to say that it's been more than 18 months since I last got any of my scopes out 😮💨 but I intend to do a lot more observing over the coming season, starting with a trip to Wales where we have recently bought a new static caravan under far darker skies than I enjoy at home.......I've booked a few days off work either side of the New Moon on 13th November and I intend to go purely for the purpose of astronomy....so the wife is staying at home with the dog...just me, the scope and a bottle of fine scotch whisky (and the odd Indian takeaway). In preparation, I am putting together an observing list on SkySafari 6 Plus which includes, almost exclusively, of objects i have never been able to observe from my light polluted skies at home, the remnants of the Messier catalogue (those available in November), some globs, and my personal favourites, quite a few fainter planetary nebula. I will probably revisit some old favourites and get some coloured doubles in as well. As most of those who use SkySafari know, you can order your observation list in a number of ways, in fact, quite a number of ways, and I've never really got my head around the best way to do it, examples are "Transit Time", "Rise Time" and "Set Time". I want to organise my time through the night to maximise the best time to observe all the objects in the list in the best possible order (we're talking GoTo by the way)...so......what is the best option for sorting your list, Transit, Rise or Set???.....I won't even mention all the other options in the list, declination, azimuth, ascension etc 😖.......although "Altitude" might be an option. Opinions please
-
It all depends on what you want to do. you've identified your first problem....EQ mounts are not designed for scanning the sky, they are designed so you can track objects once you have found them, so, if you want to take photos or stay on one object with it staying in the field of view, then an eq is what you want (however, that presents further issues in the form of polar alignment). You are also correct in that an eq1 is garbage. My first mount was an EQ1, it was really hard work so I progressed to an EQ5 which i then adapted to GoTo and then on to an EQ6-R-Pro.......the difference is huge. Personally I like to stay on my objects for quite some time, after all , it's usually been a pain in the backside finding it, so i like to study it, make notes and remember it so I have a driven EQ that will do that with ease, sometimes staying in the fov for as much as an hour or more My advice would be, decide what you want to achieve and then save up to buy what will service that achievement, no matter what you decide, get rid of the EQ1.......eventually.
-
Totally agree. I also made a Telrad template for Interstellarium.........
-
You've clearly ordered far too much gear from FLO recently, the May Contain Clouds effect is accumulative based on the number of orders placed
-
SkySafari is very useful for lists
-
For the above, these are a god send https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/astro-essentials-right-angled-eyepiece-for-polar-scopes.html
-
I don't know, I think the electronic version can be good fun as well........ Screenshot 2023-01-24 at 18.06.59.pdf
-
Just as a side issue. If you are using a SynScan hand controller to align. The third star on a three star alignment has no effect on pointing accuracy. It does not contribute whatsoever. The purpose of the third star is to account and compensate for cone error which is why the third star should be on the opposite side of the meridian from the first two. Cone error becomes far worse when you point towards an object on the opposite side of the meridian from your alignment stars so if you don’t suffer from cone error and/or your night’s targets are on the same side as your alignment stars (which is best practice) you don’t need the third star and it won’t improve your accuracy. Two star alignment is all you need.
-
I know what you mean. I’ve been visually observing for years and find that I’m busy all night through every session….observing, finding, planning, Star mapping, changing eyepieces and filters to mention just a few of the jobs. I can’t imagine AP being like that
-
I’m a visual observer who has just bought a DSLR to give AP a go so I’ll watch but no matter what visual observing will always be my first love……I do hope they explain in very basic English though 🤣
-
I’ve got the mount on order and should arrive next week I think with FLO receiving the latest delivery. I ordered the mount only, I already have a tripod and the extension pier. I’m a bit concerned with @Astroscot2 review but looking at the photo, the mount appears to be well loaded up, are you sure that is only 4kg? I have no experience of AP and intend to use it with a Canon 250D to start with. Looking forward to contributing to this thread 👍
-
……..I’d take the same view as a doctor……you know, when he asks how much you drink and he secretly doubles the amount you say 🤣
-
Two pies for me please. Thanks Darren
-
https://www.drumroamin.co.uk/index.htm
-
Just Google the campsite and give Leslie a call quoting the Star Party
-
NEW Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer GTi
Jiggy 67 replied to FLO's topic in Sponsor Announcements and Offers
Your manual will tell you which remote to use, my 250D does. I wanted a decent intervelometre for mine for multiple long exposures so went for the below for not much more money https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01MTC2IAH/ref=emc_b_5_t -
Well it looks like we might be good for a few nights in the week….Just in time for the full moon!! 😢😢