Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

My first Jupiter of the year


michaelmorris

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

That's the one I have my eye on, at the mo for 4X I'm struggling with 2 stacked skywatcher x2's have you by any chance also got a tal x3 as I wondered how the tal and the imagemate compare, obviously not in mag but in imaging quality. Wondering if it's worth getting the tal AND the imagemate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the one I have my eye on, at the mo for 4X I'm struggling with 2 stacked skywatcher x2's have you by any chance also got a tal x3 as I wondered how the tal and the imagemate compare, obviously not in mag but in imaging quality. Wondering if it's worth getting the tal AND the imagemate.

The Antares 3x I have is good for observing but I haven't tried it for imaging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the one I have my eye on, at the mo for 4x I'm struggling with 2 stacked skywatcher x2's have you by any chance also got a tal x3 as I wondered how the tal and the imagemate compare, obviously not in mag but in imaging quality. Wondering if it's worth getting the tal AND the imagemate.

I've got two barlows. A Celestron 2 x Ultima and the 4 x Imagemate. I suspect that the only circumstances where having 2x, 3x and 4x barlows would be where the 3x provided the optimal compromise between image size and camera gain. On my f10 8" LX200 I suppose this might be useful for relatively dim targets such as Saturn or Mercury. Has anyone any thoughts on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking on the lines of like Jupiter or Saturn with moons shots, it's nice to get as big a 'planet' as you can but sometimes it would be nice to just squeeze in the moons, bearing in mind their positions then some variance in mag would be beneficial to be able to fit what you want in as small a frame as possible.

Whilst typing this i just had another idea.... planetary mosaic! hmmmm best of both worlds, biggest planet you can manage and then move over to moons, grab again and then stitch the results. Some experimentation may be in order here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with trying to capture Jupiter and its moons at high magnification is the very large difference in brightness. If you want the moons you'll overexpose Jupiter horribly. The only way I have found is to use two exposures, one for Jupiter and one for the moons, then make a composite image of the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Images are excellent. Jupiter is going to get a lot more attention, and perhaps the SEB will creep back into view.

I wonder how the transition will happen. Slowly, or reasonably quickly.

Ron.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed yours and other people's images with that black box with your name in and some image details, is it a piece of software that does it or is it just a template you use in your graphics package?

Sort of both. It's a (modified) action from Noel's Carboni's set of Astronomy Tools actions for Photoshop.

Astronomy Tools Action Set by ProDigital Software

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't use photoshop, I'm an old die hard paint shop pro user, I don't suppose you know if they're 8BF filter files are they, if they are they should work with psp. They don't seem to have a trial version either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.