Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

1.25 solar wedge


wookie1965

Recommended Posts

I am getting conflicting information I was told anything over a 4" scope should use a 2" Wedge I have seen 1.25mm wedges for sale on astronomy merchants saying it can be used up to a 150mm I want one for my 5" Refractor but am not sure what to get can someone help me please. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have used my 1.25 inch Lunt wedge with my ED120 refractor a number of times without any problem. The heat sink gets pretty warm but that is what it is meant to do.

I use a single polarising filter on the eyepiece so control the final image brightness. Some folks love the Baader Continuum filter as an alternative to the polarising one.

I take the finder off my scope when using the wedge and never leave the scope unattended.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@wookie1965 I think I confirmed my opinion on FB, although to be fair there is plenty of mixed information out there.

Lunt say ‘1.25” is best up to 100mm, 2” best up to 150mm’, but that does not imply you can’t use the 1.25” up to 150mm

Some relevant discussion here:


For me, the 1.25” will be fine in the 127mm. The disk on the back of the wedge is designed to get hot, so you should be concerned if it does.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Peter Drew said:

I've used my 1.25" Lunt wedge and a 1.25" Lacerta wedge on a 8.5" refractor without problems.  A 2" wedge would be better, the Lacerta is about the size of a 2".      🙂

In what way would it be better Peter? Better quality view or better cooling? I’ve not found a problem with cooling on the 1.25” wedges, but from a quality perspective the Baader Coolwedge is definitely better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stu said:

In what way would it be better Peter? Better quality view or better cooling? I’ve not found a problem with cooling on the 1.25” wedges, but from a quality perspective the Baader Coolwedge is definitely better.

I get the feeling that the mass of a 2" version of a wedge might handle the heat issue more comfortably.  What intrigues me more is the obsession with the care taken to ensure thermal equilibrium of optics for night time use versus the full heat of the Sun being introduced into the OTA when a wedge is in use yet the instrument still being capable of sub arcsecond resolution on a good day .          🤔

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.