tooth_dr Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Unguided belt modded EQ6 250px Atik 383L+ R 30 x 80s / G 22 x 80s / B 20 x 80s = Total exposure 1 hour 35 mins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craney Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Nice one Adam. I only twigged last week that this is the galaxy that the 'famous black-hole' picture came from. Did you do a lot of processing to extract the jet ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Excellent image. Interesting how the negative image brings it out more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooth_dr Posted May 6, 2019 Author Share Posted May 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, Craney said: Nice one Adam. I only twigged last week that this is the galaxy that the 'famous black-hole' picture came from. Did you do a lot of processing to extract the jet ?? Thanks Sean. I literally spent about 10 minutes on this. I combined the channels and adjusted levels and curves, and that was it. The jet was visible easily in 80s subs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
don4l Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Nice! I've tried to capture the jet and failed miserably. Well done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan potts Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Very nice image, amazing what can be done now, when I started this would be in a book with Hale 200 inch under it, even then it may not have been as good, maybe a bit bigger though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saganite Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Nice image Adam. The jet is clearly visible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 It is a very nice capture. I don't know what scope tooth_dr used, but the jet can be captured with quite a modest scope. I've posted this image before. It was captured with my ED80. I had set out to image the Markarian chain. It was only later on reading up about it that I realised that M87 has a jet. So I reprocessed that part of the image and found it is just about visible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooth_dr Posted May 7, 2019 Author Share Posted May 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Ouroboros said: It is a very nice capture. I don't know what scope tooth_dr used, but the jet can be captured with quite a modest scope. I've posted this image before. It was captured with my ED80. I had set out to image the Markarian chain. It was only later on reading up about it that I realised that M87 has a jet. So I reprocessed that part of the image and found it is just about visible. Nice capture yourself too! I have an ED80, and recently did Markarians chain. I didnt realise M87 was on the periphery of the FOV. I used an equally modest scope here - an old blue tube 10" Skywatcher newtonian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodd Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Pretty cool Doc....The jet is clear as a bell. Amazing. Rodd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 4 hours ago, tooth_dr said: Nice capture yourself too! I have an ED80, and recently did Markarians chain. I didnt realise M87 was on the periphery of the FOV. I used an equally modest scope here - an old blue tube 10" Skywatcher newtonian. OK. Yes, If I were to try and image M87 to bring out the jet I'd use my 8" SW Newtonian. I think too I might try a range of shorter exposure times than I usually do with my DSLR to avoid saturating the jet region with light from the M87 galaxy itself. It would make an interesting imaging exercise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astro mick Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Well done Adam.Thats mighty impressive. Mick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.