newbie alert Posted August 3, 2018 Share Posted August 3, 2018 Under a arc min is what I aim for..but depends on conditions..might be windy..might have high cloud .. I tend to guide if I'm doing 2 min exposures or 15min exposures.. I tend to get the lowest figures I can but without getting too fixated on graphs.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted August 3, 2018 Share Posted August 3, 2018 You want to try and get your PA error to within a few mins of arc, certainly less than 5 otherwise you'll get field rotation with longer exposures. Check it with the drift align tool giving it at least 3-4 mins running time in Az ad Alt and use ~2s exposures. It looks like you have a problem with DEC backlash which you need to sort out as it affects calibration. It might be caused by balance. Make sure there aren't any cables pulling down. Louise ps doing short, unguided image exposures of 10-15s on a bright object is a good way to show up any intrinsic problems independent of any guiding problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spillage Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 when I get a clear night I will run guide assistant and post up the results but I am sure that the PA report there is not that reliable and can be ignored to some what. I have recently got hold of a qhy polarscope and allot of my issues have vanished and I can only praise this bit of kit. I did try sharpcap but I found it unreliable with my old qhy5. I have upgraded to a rowan belt mod but on my old neq6 these are the kind of results I am getting. This is from tonight with a poor seeing and only got worse as the cloud rolled in. Its not perfect and I do have backlash in RA, give it time and take time to learn how your mount reacts. Eggy stars still plague my images so do not feel that you are alone with your issues. If anyone can help I am sure they will step in. After all if knowledge cannot be passed on to other then what is the point of having it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 16 minutes ago, spillage said: when I get a clear night I will run guide assistant and post up the results but I am sure that the PA report there is not that reliable and can be ignored to some what. I have recently got hold of a qhy polarscope and allot of my issues have vanished and I can only praise this bit of kit. I did try sharpcap but I found it unreliable with my old qhy5. I have upgraded to a rowan belt mod but on my old neq6 these are the kind of results I am getting. This is from tonight with a poor seeing and only got worse as the cloud rolled in. Its not perfect and I do have backlash in RA, give it time and take time to learn how your mount reacts. Eggy stars still plague my images so do not feel that you are alone with your issues. If anyone can help I am sure they will step in. After all if knowledge cannot be passed on to other then what is the point of having it. Hi I used to get that with my heq5/belt mod with a tight cluster but to one side on the target. I found that I had to get the balance precisely right (in all 3 axes) then I got the guide stars nicely centred on the target and images were great! Louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 Ooh, just a thought courtesy of another thread - make sure your setting circles are loose and free to move without catching on anything. Louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted August 4, 2018 Author Share Posted August 4, 2018 my Dec is fixed but my RA is loose, should they both be loose? i have a sharpie mark on my RA axis but use the circle to set Dec home position when setting up, should that be a sharpie mark too and the circle loose? it doesn't inhibit rotation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 They can catch - usually it's the RA one which causes problems. I suppose it's a matter of judgement as to whether either are catching/causing a problem. In another thread the poster had a problem with his new heq5 'juddering' and it seems that it was the RA setting circle causing the problem. So many things to go wrong.... Louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted August 4, 2018 Author Share Posted August 4, 2018 21 minutes ago, Thalestris24 said: They can catch - usually it's the RA one which causes problems. I suppose it's a matter of judgement as to whether either are catching/causing a problem. In another thread the poster had a problem with his new heq5 'juddering' and it seems that it was the RA setting circle causing the problem. So many things to go wrong.... Louise i followed the astronomyshed setup video. RA is nice and loose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbie alert Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 13 hours ago, spillage said: when I get a clear night I will run guide assistant and post up the results but I am sure that the PA report there is not that reliable and can be ignored to some what. I have recently got hold of a qhy polarscope and allot of my issues have vanished and I can only praise this bit of kit. I did try sharpcap but I found it unreliable with my old qhy5. I have upgraded to a rowan belt mod but on my old neq6 these are the kind of results I am getting. This is from tonight with a poor seeing and only got worse as the cloud rolled in. Its not perfect and I do have backlash in RA, give it time and take time to learn how your mount reacts. Eggy stars still plague my images so do not feel that you are alone with your issues. If anyone can help I am sure they will step in. After all if knowledge cannot be passed on to other then what is the point of having it. First thing id suggest is to make sure that you're actually guiding on a star..if you have it looping and move the mount with the manual guide and the stars don't move then they're not stars..just need to adjust the exposure and gain until you have stars...to guide at .37 Rms you're in premium mount country.. That's the first thing id look at Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 3 hours ago, Anthonyexmouth said: i followed the astronomyshed setup video. RA is nice and loose. I'm not sure which one? Don't waste time using setting circles as part of your setup - they are u/s Louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spillage Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 I took 4 900s exposures on ic1396 no flats darks with this tracking and apart from some issues and slightly eggs stars (due to me messing with dec balance) it was ll good. I am sure the heq5 and neq6 worm gears are similar so if you can do the belt mod and a bit of a hypertune it will work wonders. Image below has been ran through startools quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted August 4, 2018 Author Share Posted August 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Thalestris24 said: I'm not sure which one? Don't waste time using setting circles as part of your setup - they are u/s Louise i only use the Dec circle to check the home position before switching on. am i doing that wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spillage Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 I just have just put a sharpie mark on the mount casing and on the dec casing above the setting circle, so if the circle moves I can still put it in the correct position. If you are platesolving then you can just roughly put the mount in the home position, take a single shot and then platesolve that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 29 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said: i only use the Dec circle to check the home position before switching on. am i doing that wrong? You can do that, or do as Spillage just said. Platesolving is great but it's probably best to ensure your mount's setup correctly and behaving nicely first. Louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted August 4, 2018 Author Share Posted August 4, 2018 i have been doing my star alignment via APT and platesolving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said: i have been doing my star alignment via APT and platesolving. Ok, no problemo then . As long as your mount is close to the home position, platesolving will correct any offsets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stub Mandrel Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 14 hours ago, spillage said: when I get a clear night I will run guide assistant and post up the results but I am sure that the PA report there is not that reliable and can be ignored to some what. I have recently got hold of a qhy polarscope and allot of my issues have vanished and I can only praise this bit of kit. I did try sharpcap but I found it unreliable with my old qhy5. I have upgraded to a rowan belt mod but on my old neq6 these are the kind of results I am getting. This is from tonight with a poor seeing and only got worse as the cloud rolled in. Its not perfect and I do have backlash in RA, give it time and take time to learn how your mount reacts. Eggy stars still plague my images so do not feel that you are alone with your issues. If anyone can help I am sure they will step in. After all if knowledge cannot be passed on to other then what is the point of having it. Haven't you got DEC guiding turned off there? Suggests excellent PA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbie alert Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 24 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said: Haven't you got DEC guiding turned off there? Suggests excellent PA Not sure on that myself..those rms figures suggest excellent guiding so id of thought wouldn't have elongated stars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_taurus83 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 16 hours ago, Anthonyexmouth said: what kind of numbers should i be getting on the PA error? I use a Polemaster. Expensive but it's the best accessory I've bought for this hobby so far. It's seeing dependant but typical error is around 1 arc minute and my guiding RMS is around 1 second. That's simply setting up with the Polemaster and guiding straight away. No drift aligning etc These summer nights are too short for that when your setting up and stripping down each session. I've been meaning to compare the Polemaster to Sharpcap for ages so I just might give it a go tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted August 4, 2018 Author Share Posted August 4, 2018 1 minute ago, david_taurus83 said: I use a Polemaster. Expensive but it's the best accessory I've bought for this hobby so far. It's seeing dependant but typical error is around 1 arc minute and my guiding RMS is around 1 second. That's simply setting up with the Polemaster and guiding straight away. No drift aligning etc These summer nights are too short for that when your setting up and stripping down each session. I've been meaning to compare the Polemaster to Sharpcap for ages so I just might give it a go tonight. would be interesting to see what you think. PA with sharpcap seemed too easy, maybe it was too good to be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spillage Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 42 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said: Haven't you got DEC guiding turned off there? Suggests excellent PA Yes I do not really bother guiding dec. I struggled with sharpcap but I also could not believe how quick I can PA with polemaster. I got lucky and got one second hand for a good price, but I can see why they charge so much for it or should I say I can see why people pay the price they ask. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_taurus83 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 I tried Sharpcap first but I got different results when I checked either side of the mount. So I had to try drift aligning. It then became clear I had mechanical backlash problems and the rubbish weather we had in Spring kept cutting short my drift align sessions so I caved and bought the Polemaster. But in the QHY documentation it states to rotate the mount using the handset. When I tried Sharpcap I was loosening the clutches to rotate the mount. I often wondered if this was the mistake I was making. Do you use the handset with Sharpcap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_taurus83 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 This is worth a read: https://openphdguiding.org/Analyzing_PHD2_Guide_Logs.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_taurus83 Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 And if you havent already download the PHD log viewer: https://openphdguiding.org/phd2-log-viewer/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spillage Posted August 4, 2018 Share Posted August 4, 2018 When you have ran PA try running PHD with guiding turned off and see how things are and which way RA and DEC drift. If I turn on DEC guiding it make my graph allot worse. If you try the development version of PHD2 then you could try the new ZFilter guiding algorithm seems to be very good so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.