Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

My take on M45 - 3hours of unmodified DSLR


sagramore

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone. I've not posted in a while - combination of summer, laziness, and very poor weather. However, I am back!

I recently gave M45 a go. My main problem is local light pollution combined with being surrounded by tall houses, which means I only get something like 2-4 hours of visibility on a target if it ever gets in the right part of the sky. As such my first session only bagged me around 80 minutes of subs. Last night I managed to get another 100 minutes for a total of 3 hours. Coupled with this I learned a couple of new noise reduction techniques courtesy of Doug German's Youtube channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvL...DVQr1JDptAsbQg) I recommend anyone new to this and processing in Photoshop takes the time to go through his absolutely brilliant tutorials!!

Anyway, here we are. I know I still pushed the noise up too high in the end, but I really wanted a hint of the dust, so I decided the tradeoff was worth it.

Thanks for looking, and please do try the Flickr link to the full-resolution image as the small version here is very compressed.

Hamish / sagramore

CLICK HERE for Flickr link for full resolution version

M45 Both Sessions - First Attempt - Finished 1080p for upload.jpg

Messier 45 (Pleiades)

2016-11-07 and 2016-11-29, near Swindon, England

Gear:
* Skywatcher 130-PDS with 0.9x coma corrector (585 mm, f/4.5)
* Skywatcher NEQ6-Pro Synscan
* Canon EOS 550D (unmodified) and Skywatcher 2" LP filter
* ZWO ASI120-MC guide camera
* Skywatcher Startravel 80 guide scope

Acquisition & Processing:
* AstrophotographyTools (APT) and PHD2 guiding with dithering
* (15 + 21) x 300s = total 180 minutes @ ISO 800 in two sessions
* Flats, library darks (12-14 C and 7-12 C), library bias
* Stacked in DeepSkyStacker and post-processed in Photoshop CC 2015 with Gradient Xterminator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks! Yeah, I lost almost 30 mins of time last night just because of a problem calibrating PHD for the guiding....

I forgot to add that this is my first ever image processed with data from two separate sessions - something I had to learn to do today. Perhaps a 3rd session will help bring that dust out with less noise? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sagramore said:

Thanks! Yeah, I lost almost 30 mins of time last night just because of a problem calibrating PHD for the guiding....

I forgot to add that this is my first ever image processed with data from two separate sessions - something I had to learn to do today. Perhaps a 3rd session will help bring that dust out with less noise? :)

Keep on adding to it. Are you using a plate solver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A plate solver to ensure I frame it correctly each time? If so, no, just eyeballing it :) I use some harsh dithering anyway so a small amount of movement is actually helpful really. If that's not what you meant, then I am intrigued to know more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I will take a look! My biggest problem really is that I have to completely dismantle my kit between sessions as well so setting up requires full alignment again so I often can't rely on the goto until it's properly configured!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just never ever remove the scope from the rings when multi night imaging with a Newtonian or your diffraction spikes will not line up between sessions.  Getting the same framing is less of an issue....especially with M45 I can see the seven sisters in live view on my 1000D. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Adam J said:

Just never ever remove the scope from the rings when multi night imaging with a Newtonian or your diffraction spikes will not line up between sessions.  Getting the same framing is less of an issue....especially with M45 I can see the seven sisters in live view on my 1000D. 

I had actually never considered that, so thanks for the warning! While I do dismantle the setup between sessions, I generally don't take the scope out of the rings (or remove the guide scope from the rings that are also attached) - tends to be stored as one unit. However there is a chance I'd be moving to use the 200P and forget that this is a problem, so thanks again :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.