Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Thoughts on which imaging rigs to concentrate on


Gina

Recommended Posts

Reprocess of Jelly Fish with matching darks.  44 subs this time (1 failed) 60s g500 -30C.  I think this is a bit better :)  Post process in GIMP - now going to transfer master image to Photoshop in my Win 7 desktop and post process in that.  More powerful then GIMP and also 16 bit whereas GIMP is still only 8 bit.

IC443 Ha 44 60 g500 -30C Cropped.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now post processing in Photoshop.  16bit processing is so much better - a lot of detail was lost in GIMP - but I want to do a lot more in PixInsight as I get to learn more about it - gradually making progress - slow and steady :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This image crop gives about the same FOV as I would get with a 200mm lens and I was going to set that up for this sort of image size but with the 200mm lens being more than a stop slower I'm wondering if the 200mm lens would be such a good idea - I would need twice as much imaging time to get the same amount of data and although better resolution, do I really need such high resolution.  I'm thinking deeper data might be better than higher resolution given limited imaging time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been processing some data from way back in the beginning of October, of the Cygnus area widefield taken with the 28mm f3.5 lens.  So far in Ha (but there's also OIII) - 160 original frames reduced to 100 by inspection in Blink.  So that's 100 Ha subs of 120s with gain of 500 and temperature around -30C.

There were also 25 matching darks from the time with one duff leaving 24 which I've integrated for calibration.  Already had matching master bias and flat so processed in BPP saved in TIFF format and post processed in Photoshop via TeamViewer in Win 7 desktop.  I'm currently capturing more 120s darks to add to the previous 24 but not sure they're needed.

Cygnus WF 100 Ha 120s g500 -30C enhabced.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nor me :D  It means either I have to try and remember how I did it in Photoshop over two years ago or get reading about PixInsight.  I think I would prefer the latter as that's the way I want to go in future.  My main machine is now my Linux Mint desktop which is running PixInsight whilst the Win 7 machine has been relegated to the background as a server just for things that won't run in Linux - accessed via TeamViewer.  My aim is to move away from Windows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I can work out the general process.  Take the all calibrated lights and register them against a reference from one colour or register the master lights - don't know which is best.

As I recall from two and a half years ago I used registration software to align the separate colours to one of them as reference then took them into Photoshop as layers ... hmmm... maybe something to look into tomorrow when I'm fresher...  Meanwhile, I could calibrate more data, register and integrate into mono images.  Or do something else entirely! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decided that I might try processing the RGBHa data I collected for M31 a while back so I'm capturing bias and dark frames to match.  I may capture M31 later with the 200mm f4 lens but I have a feeling that I shall be wanting to capture other DSOs in NB.  No clear sky tonight so gabbing any half useful bias and dark frames is worthwhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Captured all those - no problem.  Downloaded the darks and now downloading the bias frames but something has gone wrong with the gigabit Ethernet on my obsy laptop - the data rate has dropped vastly to little more than I get with WiFi.  I have tried rebooting but no better :(  Checked connections and they seem fine.  Very puzzling.  I guess that laptop is pretty "long in the tooth" now or maybe it's finally succumbed to the cold and damp. 

I really need to sort out an alternative.  I've been dithering too long now to return the mini PC box to Amazon for no specific reason so maybe I should have another go at getting it working.  Or I guess I could try returning it as no good for what I want.  TBH I don't really want to mess about trying to return it and I don't know what else to get.  I ought to be able to get it working - replace Win10 with Linux for instance or dual boot.

Clear night skies should be returning soon - maybe tomorrow night - so I need to sort things out.  The laptop is still working for capturing images and so is the relatively slow WiFi file transfer but the loss of Ethernet speed worries me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It used to take a couple of seconds per 32MB file but now I've timed it at 20s - ten times as long so it looks like the line has gone from gigabit to 100Mb/s.  The Ethernet switch is showing gigabit though on its LEDs.

20s for 32MB means 20s for 256Mb though I think there are a couple of extra bits in the protocol.  That works out at 8Mb/s so it looks like I'm getting 10Mb/s which would be right for 10bit per data byte protocol.

EDIT>>>  No that's not right - I'm not awake yet :D

Edited by Gina
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32MByte with a protocol of 10 bits per data byte would be 320Mbits.  So we have 320Mbits in 20s ie. 16Mbits in 1s a data rate of 16MB/s.  I think that's right now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First "trap" was that the XISF master files resulting from BPP contains three images - the result plus rejection low and rejection high.  So I need to bring these up and save the image file on it's own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.