Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Welcome to Stargazers Lounge

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customise your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Freddie

PHD2 Beta

61 posts in this topic

I've installed it, slightly different look that PHD, still waiting for a clear night to test it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can give it a go with the cam and mount simulators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just noticed, this version is not written by Craig Stark. It seems to be a third party version produced by a private company, not sure I like the way thats going. I'll stick with what I have now, it works!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just noticed, this version is not written by Craig Stark. It seems to be a third party version produced by a private company, not sure I like the way thats going. I'll stick with what I have now, it works!

No - I believe that Bret has a link to the OpenPHD. I had the same initial thought that it was Bret's company providing it (it's not clear it's an open source application that Bret provides input into). Looking at some of the posts on the OpenPHD2 support group - Craig still posts/guides the discussion/development.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, Craig is involved with but not running this new version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to see Craig is still involved in the process, he's a bit of a cult hero in my book :)

As long as it stays with the spirit PHD, written for the love of the hobby/science, simple and free (forever), I'll be happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the new layout with both target and traditional graphs all in one window... had it running with simulators, and like the others, can't wait for a clear night to try this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been running PHD2 for a while tonight. Same performance as PHD1 but with some very nice new features.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ran last night for about 4 hours. No problems at all. Has some nice new features like trend lines on the graph, different min motion for RA and dec, RMS errors for RA and dec and errors in " if you input scope and pixel info. Well worth a look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it work out your polar misalignment yet? :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've tried to take some darks, however the application gets stuck and crashes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it does work out PA error, in degrees and pixels.

Took darks on my Lodestar no problem. You can report the bug and you will get a reply really quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you pop in your guide scope and cam FL and pixel size it will change the graph axis and indicate the PA error at the bottom of the graph.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi can anybody help me the focal length of my celestron 9x50 finderscope? am I right in thinking its 200,then I use a qhy5 guide cam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try taking a snapshot from your guider cam and upload it to astrometry.net:

http://nova.astrometry.net/upload

This will tell you your pixel scale from that you can work out your focal length using the following formula:

FL (mm) = [ pixel size (um) / pixel scale (arcsec/pixel) ] * 206.3

The pixel size of a QHY5 camera is 5.2 um

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really like the interface on this and the noise reduction, graphing, star profile and general layout is much nicer - however, it worked for about 20 minutes after calibration then crashed out for no apparent reason. I've gone back to unguided tonight as the sky is so good tonight and I want to get some more capture before the moon rises. I'll check the log files tomorrow and e-mail in a ticket if there's any useful debug.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a similar issue like Jake, It stopped guiding, but wouldn't let me restart without having to end task the application. Not sure there's an option, but both RA and DEC traces were the same colour on the graph, which made it hard to distinguish what was what. Other than that, and the time it took to calibrate (even after changing the settings to match that of PHD) it worked well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a similar issue like Jake, It stopped guiding, but wouldn't let me restart without having to end task the application. Not sure there's an option, but both RA and DEC traces were the same colour on the graph, which made it hard to distinguish what was what. Other than that, and the time it took to calibrate (even after changing the settings to match that of PHD) it worked well.

I gave it a quick try on Monday night. I had also tried to match the settings to the same as I have in PHD1 and PHD2 took much longer to calibrate. After that the guiding graph seemed to be all over the place and as the DEC & RA traces were the same colour it was difficult to work out which was which. As it was the first clear night for a while, I wimped out and went back to PHD1 for the rest of the session. I'll give PHD2 another go when I have more time to do it justice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I ran it last night for about an hour before the clouds rolled in.

There's some nice changes from PHD1: one of which is the program doesn't lock up if you forget to turn off guiding before you issue a slew command!

I also really like the new polar alignment error display, makes things much quicker/simpler to get good alignment. Basically, you turn off DEC guiding and let the star drift. PHD then works out the misalignment and draws a circle on the guide display. You then adjust whichever bolt you're working on so the star moves from the centre of the circle to the line drawn by PHD. Easy :D

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi can anybody help me the focal length of my celestron 9x50 finderscope? am I right in thinking its 200,then I use a qhy5 guide cam.

Although taking an image through it and using astrometry.net to resolve it would be more accurate, when I used my celestron 9x50 finderscope as a guidescope, I worked on the basis of it having a focal length of 210mm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although taking an image through it and using astrometry.net to resolve it would be more accurate, when I used my celestron 9x50 finderscope as a guidescope, I worked on the basis of it having a focal length of 210mm

I guess you could also measure the distance from the lens to the sensor when the scope is in focus. This would give you a reasonable idea as well I would think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To change the graph colours, bring up the graph then shift click on the RA/DEC tab.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.