Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Circle T Ortho?


paul mc c

Recommended Posts

I agree with the above assessments. Small improvements in the BGO except for ergonomics. Sometimes small improvements matter though .... they can make that subtle, "on the limit" detail just a little bit easier to see :D

Generally, it's during the periods of excellent seeing that these differences are a little more noticeable I've found.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take manufacturers published afov's with a pinch of salt.

I've measured the field stops on most of my eyepieces and with some exceptions(eg:Tal's), the true fov is often considerably lower than the published afov.

Take the good ole volcano topped orthos(edit: these calculations were not done by me, but were published on an excel eyepiece file available on 'cloudy nights')

FL/published afov/calculated fov

4mm : 41 / 42

5mm : 43 / 38

6mm : 43 / 40

7mm : 42 / 38

9mm : 42 / 42

12.5mm : 44 / 39

18mm : 46 / 41

25mm : 47 / 40

Have yet to read anywhere this calculation done with either U.O. or Baader flat-tops. Would be interesting to find out.

It's relatively easily done if you have an accurate set of calipers.

Andy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.