Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

SCT collimation - should I go for better?


Recommended Posts

I was quite amazed at how good the collimation of my SCT was 'out of the box'.

Visual star tests looked pretty good to me, although I am blighted by a severe chunck of astigmatism which - even when corrected by specs or contact lenses - makes this kind of judgement quite hard for me.

Anyway, in between an imaging run on Jupiter tonight I slewed to Hamal to refocus. I decided to do a quick capture on the defocused star and the result is below. I had the capture software maxed out (highest gain, maximum exposure, and 5 fps) and this is the resulting stack. Seems to show a slight skewing and my question is, is this good enough on my f/10 SCT or should I re-collimate? I ask just because the star test looked OK to my naked (and not very good) eye and I am not sure if other artifacts might be present (seeing was pretty poor when I captured this). Not sure if stacking to check collimation is even valid!

Thoughts very welcome!

post-24484-133877697571_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My daylight rough collimation had got the startest to a similar position as in your pic.

Before adjustment, the view of Jupiter had a sort of misty washed out look. After adjustment(primary mirror in my case), the difference was like a punch to the face. Pow. Sharp contrasty image.

Whilst my scope is a Tal 200K, I'd reckon the end results for you should be similar.

Cheers,

Andy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.