Jump to content

vineyard

Members
  • Posts

    1,147
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by vineyard

  1. I didn't have a chance to do any viewing today, but did manage to get some time yesterday.  JPGs for size.

    The whole disk is w/o a GPC, the closeup w a 2.6x GPC as per @Rustedsuggestion earlier.

    Its ginormous - I guess we can't tell how deep it is, but that would probably be 20-30 Earths in cross-section not including the plumes?

    Sun_120414_HA_Q3_ap2552_as25_imppg(220124t2wd)_gimp_watermarked.jpg

    Sun_120724_HA_Q3_ap442_as50_imppg(210924t2)_gimp_watermarked.jpg

    • Like 11
  2. 7 minutes ago, Laurieast said:

    Why?

    I think it depends on how the secondary is attached - I've read in some places (CN if I recall) that if the secondary is glued, then the reflected sunlight hitting the secondary could melt the glue.

    Ah sorry, I just realised I was clumsy - when I was saying "wedge" in the original post, I meant a Herschel WL wedge rather than a tripod wedge.  Apologies.

  3. Hello,

    I have an old ETX125 (f15) - it's in very good condition.  I don't use it anymore, so am wondering whether it might be worth selling it to someone who could make more use of it.

    But before I do that, was wondering are there any interesting projects that could be done with it to turn it into a dedicated scope.  (For example, I did think of putting a wedge on the back, since with the obstruction it's probably the same (or less) free aperture as a 4" frac - but then read that that would be a v-e-r-y bad idea for the secondary mirror!).

    Any clever ideas?

    Cheers,

    Vin

  4. After suggestion by @Rusted in a different day's imaging thread about how he threads GPCs into the nose of his camera, I thought I'd experiment with that.  And used 1.25x & 2.6x.  The image on the screen is definitely bigger w both (w the 2.6x the whole disk no longer fits on the FOV).  Images are below - where I was able to take more or less the same composition w each of the GPCs I've noted that (hence pls forgive some repeat framings).  In some of the images I also tried different numbers of APs in AS!3 just to see whether there is a dramatic difference.

    It's interesting - I think I'm quite surprised by how well the 2.6x GPC came out in ROI tbh, a better sense of dynamism?  I did also try some 2x2 binning but unfortunately the FC txt files didn't capture that (so either I made a mistake & didn't bin, or I should have written it down).

    Whole disk (1.25x GPC):Sun_115422_gpc125_Q3_ap1384_as10_imppg(211122wd)_gimp_watermarked.thumb.png.145fc0ebf7f6af84e3050f87a665a8b7.png

    SW limb (1.25x GPC):Sun_114545_Q3_ap445_as10_imppg(220124t2wd)_gimp_watermarked.png.72f6f8276731ca640c4380195fe7085a.png

    SW limb (2.6x GPC):Sun_123758_gpc260_Q4_ap708_as5_imppg(211122wd)_gimp_watermarked.png.02553d364d17c7ae15c326519b8c6959.png

    NW limb (1.25x GPC):Sun_120317_gpc125_Q3_ap4004_as10_imppg(210924t2)_gimp_watermarked.png.0d330761128e075c2bd860310bc39f63.png

    NW limb (2.6x GPC):Sun_124034_gpc260_Q4_ap1623_as10_imppg(211122wd)_gimp_watermarked.thumb.png.0d0d4f68c97c636d320882e68c091076.png

    ROI (1.25x GPC, larger APs):Sun_115909_gpc125_Q3_ap759_as10_imppg(220125)_gimp_watermarked.png.e6edf302fd98ae75f151b855d803f8e7.png

    Same ROI (1.25x GPC, smaller APs):Sun_120551_gpc125_Q3_ap2261_as10_imppg(220125)_gimp_watermarked.png.8346abf62dba7318dba591a775fc2673.png

    Same ROI (2.6x GPC):Sun_124307_gpc260_Q4_ap1113_as10_imppg(211122wd)_gimp_watermarked.png.8cbef1f61e020e93929da94c43dda5b9.png

    SE limb (2.6x GPC, larger APs):Sun_123016_gpc260_Q3_ap890_as10_imppg(211122wd)_gimp_watermarked.png.8b23cdba693b184e19a9f32bf5cef13e.png

    SE limb (2.6x GPC, smaller APs):Sun_123427_gpc260_Q3_ap1461_as25_imppg(220201)_gimp_watermarked.png.435912d9bfbb205198f0320d31d92b09.png

     

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1
  5. 20 minutes ago, jock1958 said:

    Can it be adapted to incorporate a motor drive? 

    Hi @jock1958 yes it can (I did exactly that w my old SP mount w some old Vixen clone motors on both axes).  It becomes whisper quiet & is brilliant for high power lunar or planetary (I regularly took my 102M f/10 to 333x & it did not break a sweat - rock solid, lovely views of Martian polar ice cap & of course the moon).  I used to keep mine in alt-az mode (& it really is easy to swap between the two) but after putting the motors on, switched it back to EQ b/c it was just so much easier.  And the way the cogs work, if you're ever out of power, you can just unlock a little tightener to unmesh and go back to manual slow-mo.  Ingenious.

    I did actually put mine up for sale in a foolish fit of kit-guilt a few months back but luckily there were no takers so it went back into the shed to live another day.  Its just a lovely mount.  @F15RulesDave that photo of your 102M in its cradle and mounted is giving me a hankering - if I had the space I would permanently mount the 102M on the SP - a perfect combination.  Enjoy Bortle 2 with that!

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
  6. So far so good🤞🏾!  Took it for a spin last night - about 5 hrs of data, and best regular RMS yet (not sure what the avg was over the night, but was getting c 0.8 quite often w a 1m+ long setup that comes in at the max recommended load fro AP, so quite happy w that given weight & moment).  Curious to see what happens w a lighter wide-field setup.

    That warped belt was really affecting things.  Reckon the RA can still be improved a bit (has a bigger variance than the DEC) so maybe s/t to work on later in the year on the hyper-tuning side.

    Hopefully it stays like this for quite a while - thanks again all, much appreciated & yet another example of SGL community spirit 🙏🏾

    • Like 1
  7. Thanks @Sunshine - yes, while I reckon the images could be improved, I think that's the best whole disk I've taken so far - a combination of the seeing & the kit I guess.  The Ha scope is a Solarscope SF50 single stack etalon threaded onto an old TV76.  The camera is an old discontinued ASI178MM-cool (using it uncooled), with an Astronomik L1 filter (otherwise the 178MMc sensor goes bananas).

    Cheers

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.