Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

markse68

Members
  • Posts

    2,575
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by markse68

  1. Not sure about this Sunshine? I had mine mounted at 45 deg rotation and it seemed to work ok- it recognised the rotation and the horizon on the phone screen was consequently at an angle and it was able to find objects just fine. Maybe the imu gets a bit confused at times but it still seems to work with the platesolving Mark
  2. I don’t get how they can parent platesolving- it’s been around for a long time i think? Maybe just their method but it’s using 4 stars to get a finger print- other methods maybe possible? Mark
  3. i didn’t- pretty sure it wasn’t there- only revealed in the photo 😱 Nah it’s a chimney they had to “decorate” for planning permission i think 🤣
  4. M101 was at Zenith- hard to zero in with starsense and as expected- vain hope of spotting it (anything) with a 6” scope from London skies. Oh well. Moon and Venus were very decent though. Trying out my new focuser- lovely Mark
  5. I do- it’s a fine scope and deserved a nice focuser Mark
  6. This arrived while I was away- 3d printed base for the new focuser for my Tal. Works rather nicely and is “quick release” so i can store the focuser safely when not in use. Mark
  7. careful now- the old smooth side tvs are quite addictively collectible! Lovely old things Mark
  8. Phew- that's a relief Magnus- I was a bit worried you'd be disappointed by the ff but it's great it worked out well for you. As I mentioned in pm I removed the ff in the end as although it was improving the edge of field in my setup, it was unfortunately vignetting the 16mm nagler fov and the field with that ep seems pretty flat anyhow Mark
  9. I’ve got the earlier LW tripod and fixed HD tripod- not the same as the current options but similar i think. The HD is enormous and quite ungainly for moving around but like you say- rock solid. The LW is a lot more manoeuvrable. I was using it first with a GM8 then a G11 with an 8” f4.5 newt. I think if you don’t extend the legs which you don’t really need to do for ap then the LW is plenty sturdy. My problem is the whole building shakes when trucks go by on the arterial road close by- no amount of tripod sturdiness helps! Mark
  10. The starsense app was developed by SkySafari for Celestron I think so we can only hope that one day they will be allowed to incorporate it as a plug-in into full blown SS- would be really awesome then with the huge catalog and ability to make observing lists etc. right now I run Skysafari on my phone for the lists and Starsense on an older phone for the finding. So 🤞
  11. Not the postie- had to travel a fair way to pick this up- new focuser for my Tal 150p Mark
  12. I think this confirms that Siberia does = Tal. Just different branding. Not mine but a rather colourful “Siberia” Tal 2 just showed up on ebay Mark
  13. You seem to assume that your eyes are identical to everyone elses? I see some colour- it's very faint and doesn't exactly jump out at me but it is there in certain circumstances. I'm sorry you don't Mark
  14. Wow- looks enormous! Very very nice too! Mark
  15. but he was observing at 2pm in broad daylight when Mercury was at 45deg alt so relative to the sky background it wouldn’t be so bright- I think that’s the secret with these inner planets- bit risky though. I looked at about 7 or 8pm and it was just a kaleidoscope of atmospheric dispersion- my uhc showed me a sharpish half moon outline but it was swimming in turbulent air Mark
  16. It looks more like a Vixen LV the way the body is drawn with the smooth rubber outer- wouldn't it have been a bit cheeky for them to put a cross section of a competitors ep up like that? The shorter fl LVs were Pseudo Masuyamas with Smith barlow elements from what I can gather though only supposed to have 2 element barlows whereas that shows 3? Mark
  17. That's stunning Neil- really sharp Mark
  18. Thanks Paul yes something like that but as a self contained app- no internet connection necessary Mark
  19. I've spent my astro budget for this month but I'll probably get them both next month I think there's a gap in the market for a really well designed Moon atlas app for phone/tablet where you have images based on these LRO images/model with realistic terminator, zoomable with every detail identified and more detail/identifiers as you zoom in. That would be perfect . A much better version of what SkySafari offers which is ok but not great and awkward to use. Mark
  20. damn- so i need both then 😆 Thanks Franklin! Mark
  21. Hi Peter, do you have both the Duplex and the 21st century atlas? How do they compare? I noticed that the 21st C has more pages yet the Duplex has 2versions of each page (refractor/newt view) so is the scale bigger in the 21st C atlas? Mark edit- just read your nice review on CN
  22. after waiting months for a sh 1.25” clicklock to turn up in the classifieds, I gave in and bought a new one. It’s very nice. Expensive, but nice. It has 2 long pins that are pressed in against the ep barrel clamping it in place and forcing it parallel to the focuser bore with a 3 point contact- much like the Glatter Parallizer adapter which is also very nice. I like that it has no rubber grippy bits too. Mark
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.