iPeace

Is that just the tripod, or the panning head as well? A good carbon job can be had at around 1.3kg. Depends on the desired max height, number of leg sections (more is shorter collapsed length, but marginally less stable), etc. Your panning head looks pretty lightweight as it is; may not be easy to shed weight there. The Gitzo GH1720QR is a nice option at 460g, rated for 10kg.

As well as I can determine on the scales, 4800-4900g. as pictured, with 5mm T6 Nagler.

I'll see what I can do here and let you know.

Don't have this figure in my head. I'm currently residing in a hotel, so I'll have to improvise. I think they have scales down in the fitness room - can I get back to you after breakfast? ? You can specify what you want weighed; the setup as pictured (with accessories), the bare OTA with one tube ring and mounting foot (the other tube ring is currently only used to hold the RDF) or anything in between.

Bjorn: Borg 71FL with accessories (DIY dewshield) on a Borg geared head atop a Sirui carbon tripod. Goes everywhere.

It should be interesting - I'm a pretty dedicated 24 Panoptic user. I already like the LVW's big eye lens.

Wow, this is nice. Never tried one before. Excellent packaging and complimentary Baader drawstring pouch from @disciplus55 Thanks, Sylvain!

Libra-1.skylist Monoceros-1.skylist Virgo-1.skylist

Taurus-1.skylist Triangulum-1.skylist Ursa Major-1.skylist Ursa Minor-1.skylist Vulpecula-1.skylist

Orion-1.skylist Pegasus-1.skylist Perseus-1.skylist Pisces-1.skylist Sagitta-1.skylist Sagittarius-1.skylist Scorpius-1.skylist Scutum-1.skylist Serpens-1.skylist

Gemini-1.skylist Hercules-1.skylist Lacerta-1.skylist Leo Minor-1.skylist Leo-1.skylist Lepus-1.skylist Lynx-1.skylist Lyra-1.skylist Ophiuchus-1.skylist

Cepheus-1.skylist Coma Berenices-1.skylist Corona Borealis-1.skylist Cygnus-1.skylist Delphinus-1.skylist Draco-1.skylist Equuleus-1.skylist

Just a dump of what I've got in SkySafari so far, by constellation. At the very least, it's someplace I can find them again, should any digital disaster strike. Aquila-1.skylist Auriga-1.skylist Bootes-1.skylist Camelopardalis-1.skylist Cancer-1.skylist Canes Venatici-1.skylist Canis Major-1.skylist Cassiopeia-1.skylist

You'd obviously have to compare them on a night with ideal conditions to really know. My guess so far is: not much. I'll wait a while, if indeed I ever do.

...and I just don't get 'very very good' anywhere near home.

It's been here for a while now, but I'm still not sure what to think. It hasn't done anything more for me than the 6" f/6 - yet. I wasn't expecting a world of difference, but, well, it puts the added value of a 'better' mirror in perspective. Stanley stays.

Every scope should own one. This specimen arrived safely thanks to the care and attention of @DRT I've issued it a sleeping bag and it will be assigned to a scope in due course. Thanks Derek!

That video says it all. What a result!

It's not quite what you think...

Right! Absolutely. Besides, who needs another comparison? Who honestly has the slightest bit of interest in a Newt-out between a 6" f/6 and a 6" f/8? What possible good can be served by a first-hand account of how they perform side-by-side on Luna?

I noticed this as well. Not that I was tempted. No sir. Not at all. Full stop.

Just saying, as an owner of some very nice fracs, that the view through a Newt is surprisingly familiar. And good. Just saying.