Jump to content

 

1825338873_SNRPN2021banner.jpg.68bf12c7791f26559c66cf7bce79fe3d.jpg

 

Synta Mirror Question


Recommended Posts

About 1/4PV average and approaching 1/5PV for a really good example. Some manufacturers (not SkyWatcher) give it in just wave, not Peak to Valley ( 1/8 Wave = 1/4PV ).

I would expect the SkyWatcher to have about 88% reflectivity when new. The coatings used on Newt mirrors by SkyWatcher and Meade do deteriorate over time, and so it wouldn't be beyond reason for one to have deteriorated to 82% after about 6 or 7 years.

BTW there's some good info here on mirror coatings and testing in general. http://www.opticalmechanics.com/technical_articles/index.html

John

Edited by johninderby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always best to expect the worse case, you can't be disappointed that way. Seen it mentioned in a few threads on CN that the Synta stuff is ball park 1/4PV but if you are lucky you may get something a bit better. For a mass produced item, i would say 1/4PV is fair to expect.

All i know is i'm happy with the quality of the view all my (bar one lemon) Synta newts have given, that's all i need to know.

Edited by russ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the discussion about the quality of various brands of mirrors you shouldn't loose sight of the fact that SkyWatcher makes a really good and consistent mirror that will give you great views.

While I have a 14" OO with a 1/11PV mirror, I also have my little grab'n'go :D SkyWatcher 200P dob that I enjoy using. While the 200P may not have a premium mirror it's still a very good mirror and I don't think you could better it in a mass produced scope.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can imagine mass produced mirrors having a large variation in quality. For my 250mm I seem to have got a really good one. During the recent Mars apparition I was getting a similar sort of detail to people with 400mm scopes.

I don't see the point, in our average seeing conditions, in spending more.

I will say my 1/8PV (closer to 1/10PV) OMC-140 does produce the cleanest star images I've seen on the very best nights. So maybe if you are into double stars then the scatter free airy disk of this kind of quality would be preferable, but my 250 is the dogs whatsits for planets and a massive improvement on the 200mm Broadhurst Clarkson mirror I had some 30 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.