Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

NGC6992 close up, mark 2


rich_t

Recommended Posts

I've not been able to capture more data recently so thought I'd reprocess my NGC6992. The last one was pushed to much I think and the stars seemed to take over. I seem to miss this kind of thing until I look at other people's images and then go back to my own.

The stars were shrunk a bit using the erosion filter in astro art. This was a bit aggresive so I up'd the resolution, applied the filter and reduced it back to the original resolution, anyone else do this kind of thing?

Cheers,

Rich.

post-13484-133877396809_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ooo thats pretty!

Very nice colouring and processing.

I dont use it, but noels star reducing action I think increases the size of the image, applies a shrinking filter, and then drops the image back to its original size.

For large bloaty horrible stars, you can do the reverse, drop the image down to 8 bit jpg, select the bad star, apply Photoshops "pinch" filter, and then apply the result over the top of the original layer , preferably with a mask to just alter the affected stars.

Again, this is a great pic :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a very fine image indeed Rich. Lovely and smooth with a really ethereal feel to it.

Regarding star reduction, I use the minimum filter in photoshop, and usually significantly increase the image size before doing it, then drop back down afterwards.

Cheers

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments and the star reduction advice.

Baz - From -35 south it should get to around 24 degrees above the horizon I think. I can see it with the LX90 at low power and a UHC nebula filter. Remove the filter and the light polution wipes it out.

I used the goto on the LX90 to find it, it's in Cygnus near the star 52 Cygni.

Cheers,

Rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baz, here in the UK it is high and easy to find, and with an OIII filter is absloutely gorgeous. I do hope you manage to get a look at this one, visually it compares to the photos with a large aperture scope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.