Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

NGC 3718, Xterminated


tomato

Recommended Posts

With the cloud/full moon currently hindering my favourite imaging season, I have been looking through my archive to find photogenic galaxies which would benefit from more integration time, and seeing how they come out after applying the RC X suite of processing tools to them.

NGC 3718 is one such candidate, this 7.6 hrs of 2021 Esprit150/ASI178 LRGB data was rather spoilt by a huge slug of a dust mote just above the galaxy, which with my better handle on using Affinity Photo I have managed to cosmetically remove to a large extent. Definitely one to image again.

Image05.thumb.jpg.31c5101a5027890846f038d44b890bfa.jpg

 

  • Like 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The group to the right is HCG 56. i too have imaged it with NCG 3718, can it go into my HCG project? I don#t know but with our dearth of clear nights it may have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DaveS said:

The group to the right is HCG 56. i too have imaged it with NCG 3718, can it go into my HCG project? I don#t know but with our dearth of clear nights it may have to.

Yes, so much to image, so little time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, tomato said:

With the cloud/full moon currently hindering my favourite imaging season, I have been looking through my archive to find photogenic galaxies which would benefit from more integration time, and seeing how they come out after applying the RC X suite of processing tools to them.

NGC 3718 is one such candidate, this 7.6 hrs of 2021 Esprit150/ASI178 LRGB data was rather spoilt by a huge slug of a dust mote just above the galaxy, which with my better handle on using Affinity Photo I have managed to cosmetically remove to a large extent. Definitely one to image again.

Image05.thumb.jpg.31c5101a5027890846f038d44b890bfa.jpg

 

Great result, one I'd like to revisit myself.

I've been doing the same thing in the past month or so since buying those tools.  I've given up on PI several years ago, still hate it but blurx among other things persuaded me to rejoin the dark side.  I also had a friend of mine send me a very simple yet very effective workflow in PI that made it easy enough to use with just a few button pushes.  Then finish in my old Photoshop 

The results have been so good it has sometimes made me doubt them.but they are real, Russ is an absolute genius imo.  I just hope it doesn't eventually make me lazy at gathering my data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, tomato said:

I have been looking through my archive to find photogenic galaxies which would benefit from more integration time, and seeing how they come out after applying the RC X suite of processing tools to them.

Great result.  I've been meaning to revisit my own version of this from a few years ago - tighten things up and maybe let better noise reduction make it easier on the eye. The faint tails that curl back look great on the really long / dark sky integrations.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.