Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Recommended Posts

Soon I will buy the 2600mm pro camera and for that I need filters (36mm).  I have until now used Antlia 3 nm filter with my 1600mm pro.
(I live in a bort 6 zone)

I need to buy a whole new filterset because I have 31 mm currently, that's why I'm asking. 

Is it worth spending a little extra for the 2.8 nm filter? Or should I just go with the "safer" option --> 3 nm?
How are the Antlia LRGB filter?

Edited by Calzune
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing the spectrum curve charts, the 2.8nm filters transmit more light in Ha, SII and OIII. This is reflected in the higher price.

It's a better filter than the 3nm, so if price is not an issue, I'd go for the 2.8nm instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Calzune said:

Soon I will buy the 2600mm pro camera and for that I need filters (36mm).  I have until now used Antlia 3 nm filter with my 1600mm pro.
(I live in a bort 6 zone)

I need to buy a whole new filterset because I have 31 mm currently, that's why I'm asking. 

Is it worth spending a little extra for the 2.8 nm filter? Or should I just go with the "safer" option --> 3 nm?
How are the Antlia LRGB filter?

Its 2.8nm  +or- 0.5nm so you could end up with a 3.3nm filter.....

Adam

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Adam J said:

Its 2.8nm  +or- 0.5nm so you could end up with a 3.3nm filter.....

Adam

Or you could get a 2.7nm filter (it's +0.5nm/-0.1nm). There must also be an undisclosed margin of error for the 3nm pros.

In any case, the filter bandpass is not the only interesting metric. The fact that it transmits more Ha, OIII, SII - which is what we're interested in as imagers - shouldn't be overlooked.

In the worst case scenario, a 3.3nm filter bandpass isn't so bad... :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Peds said:

Or you could get a 2.7nm filter (it's +0.5nm/-0.1nm). There must also be an undisclosed margin of error for the 3nm pros.

In any case, the filter bandpass is not the only interesting metric. The fact that it transmits more Ha, OIII, SII - which is what we're interested in as imagers - shouldn't be overlooked.

In the worst case scenario, a 3.3nm filter bandpass isn't so bad... :)

 

Yes for the 3nm I would be shocked if its not also a similar margin, placing all these filters in overlapping error bands.

Its deminishing returns but with an element of gambling lol

Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.