The Lazy Astronomer Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 Not necessarily that pleased with this one (neither capture nor processing), but as it's my first Andromeda, I thought I'd post anyway and hopefully will be able to show improvement in subsequent attempts. A bit over 7 hours integration, with the vast majority in L and only around 40 mins each R, G and B. Hopefully will be able to shoot some more frames over the coming months before Orion starts to take my attention away. As always, comments and critisms welcome. 26 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adreneline Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 I really like the detail you've captured in the core region. Very nice. Adrian 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gogleddgazer Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 Knocks my efforts into the dark ages! Lovely image, I think it'll be a while before I build up the courage to post any of my efforts. 😄 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveS Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 That's pretty damn good for a first effort. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vlaiv Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 Nice image. I don't particularly like star reduction that you performed (or at least that is what I think that happened - all stars are tight but there is halo around them, galaxy cores also look funny), and I don't like plasticky feel to the background. There is also central bit that has very strange red cast - maybe flats issue for red channel? I know that there is pressure to show as much as you can from the data you have, but maybe try processing it less aggressive. Don't worry if your image does not show full extent of galaxy or whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lazy Astronomer Posted October 5, 2021 Author Share Posted October 5, 2021 12 minutes ago, vlaiv said: Nice image. I don't particularly like star reduction that you performed (or at least that is what I think that happened - all stars are tight but there is halo around them, galaxy cores also look funny), and I don't like plasticky feel to the background. There is also central bit that has very strange red cast - maybe flats issue for red channel? I know that there is pressure to show as much as you can from the data you have, but maybe try processing it less aggressive. Don't worry if your image does not show full extent of galaxy or whatever. Can always rely on you to spot all the issues! 😉 The background is one of things I was not very pleased with. I used Startools and l think it has a tendency to cause this type of background when the data is pushed too far. I probably should, as you say, be a bit more conservative with the processing. There was also indeed an issue with the red flats (and to certain extent, lum as well). I need to do a little investigating to find out why they didn't quite work. Unfortunately I've since disturbed the imaging train, but as it's only 40 mins of data, I think I might just throw it all away and redo the red channel entirely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkey Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 1 hour ago, The Lazy Astronomer said: The background is one of things I was not very pleased with. I used Startools and l think it has a tendency to cause this type of background when the data is pushed too far. I find the same thing with Startools. It is one of the reasons I tend to find it gives less pleasing results with nebulae. If I do use it I normally use Astroflat Pro to reduce the fragmentation in the background. I some cases I use the manual develop module instead of the autodev as this stretch can be reigned in a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alacant Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 6 hours ago, The Lazy Astronomer said: comments Hi Very nice detail. Well done. 3 hours ago, The Lazy Astronomer said: Startools and l think it has a tendency to cause this type of background Strange. That shouldn't happen. Did you do anything to the data before you loaded into st? Maybe have a look through the dataset dos and donts? Post a -link to- the data if you like. Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lazy Astronomer Posted October 11, 2021 Author Share Posted October 11, 2021 On 05/10/2021 at 22:57, alacant said: Hi Very nice detail. Well done. Strange. That shouldn't happen. Did you do anything to the data before you loaded into st? Maybe have a look through the dataset dos and donts? Post a -link to- the data if you like. Cheers Thanks alacant. I follow all of the recommendations to get the data ready for st, but I find this tends to happen when the data is perhaps pushed further than it really allows, in combination with lazy/poor use of the star reduction and superstructure modules. It's definitely user error - I'm going to reprocess when I get the time to grab some more colour data (and redo the red channel completely, as it has not calibrated well). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alacant Posted October 11, 2021 Share Posted October 11, 2021 (edited) 47 minutes ago, The Lazy Astronomer said: when the data is perhaps pushed further than it really allows Hi The big strength of st is that if you have inadvertently gone too far, it's easy to go back to AutoDev and go again. No need to start over from zero. Go as many times as you need:) if you're finding subsequent modules produce artefacts, that could not only simply be a sign of poor choice of ROIs but also poor calibration/stacking or that the data itself is not that good. in your case, clearly the quality is there. If there's detail, ST will find it like no other. What I'd recommend is looking at the calibration process again. Cheers Edited October 11, 2021 by alacant 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01012f Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 Wow, that's incredible 🙌 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VNA Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 That is gorgeous and impressive, thank you for sharing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grant93 Posted October 18, 2021 Share Posted October 18, 2021 Fantastic for a first attempt at M31, much better than mine 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now