Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Thought about  starting this thread. I feel like we all should inform eachother and newer members alike about the magngifications that can be achieved on planets,that provide the best sharpness/size ratio,depending on the scope and seeing. After this thread has grown a bit, i feel like this should be pinned,as to provide a little guide to newer members that are not experienced with planetary observing,as many will be fooled with the typical 50x per inch of aperture and get disappointed when they find that that image will be dim and blurry.

For my 8” F/6 Sky-Watcher Dob

For Saturn i like to use 150x in medium seeing and if i want something a bit bigger , switch to 240x ,which will give me a bigger,but blurrier image.iBut In good seeing, i found that 240x was very usable.When we have perfect conditions, i m certainly trying 300x.

Mars, isnt very big in the sky right now,so even at high magnifications like 300x it still appears as a small orange dot. For observing mars,I suggest waiting for it to reach opposition.It benifits hugely from it! However,this happens once every 2 years....But 5ere are other planets to keep you occupied until then, such as jupiter,saturn and   Venus.

For Venusi use 50-100-120 depending on its phase.

For  Jupiter, i like to use 150x, as it provides a very sharp image,with key features of the planet such as bands being very detailed.Waiting on my 6mm UWA Skywatcher to bring it to 200 and see how that plays out. Be careful! Don’t magnify jupiter too much, as it will loose much of its features and sharpness.

Neptune and Uranus: These two will not impress, but are certainly have a nice colour to them. Even ar high magnifications, such as 300x and 400x, they will look like small discs with color in them.Uranus will look be colored green and Neptune a fainter blue.

Mercury About mercury...Havent gotten the chance to observe it ,so the guys will have to inform you about that?

Feel free to give your own opinions as to give members a wider source of information to help them observe better ! 

Cheers and clear skies.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think much depends on local seeing conditions. Often, transparent skies usually have poor seeing due to turbulence,  while good seeing with steady air can often be misty. Its on those steady, misty nights that high powers can be used to advantage. Generally speaking though, my personal feelings are that 180X is just about right for Jupiter and Saturn, and that over magnifying the image of either will offer no gain in detail. With Mars, due to its tiny apparent size and brilliance, higher magnifications can be used to advantage.Mars while at sub 5 arc seconds in diameter can benefit from 250X to 350X and more.The high power enlarges the tiny image scale to a useable disc size, while at the same time dimming the image which allows for fleeting glimpses of its subtle albedo features. Currently, while around 4.5 arc seconds diameter, I find 370X is just about right to give an image scale large enough to reveal subtle and fleeting detail. It is far from ideal but bright areas can usually be detected as the waves of turbulence subside momentarily, and also the subtle darker markings can jump in and out of view. Patience is the key at this size and power!

Venus likes higher powers as it gets closer to a crescent and Mercury like Mars needs powers high enough to create an image large enough to see a disc where albedo markings can be seen at times. 

As a rule of thumb I'd say use Magnifications as high as you can without softening the image. But when the disc size is too tiny to be seen, then power up until the disc is large enough to be useful. Then patiently study the blurry disc for a reasonable time before concluding there's nothing to be seen. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The magnifications that you are using seem well thought through to me and similar to the ones that I use with my scopes.

I do use very high magnifications on Uranus and Neptune but not to try and see disk details (although that would be nice !). I find the very high power helps pick out their faint moons. So far I've seen Triton at Neptune and Titania and Oberon at Uranus. I think 2 more Uranian moons are possible for me if I get a really dark sky and Uranus in a reasonable position.

With some practice and careful observing you should be able to see Triton with your 8" dob at high magnification. I find that the Cartes du Ciel software gives it's position quite accurately.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a 15" f/4.5, and if seeing doesn't support my 8mm EP for 240x, I don't deem it a good night for observing planets.  I'm in the habit of checking the pesky jetstream forecast beforehand, and allowing several hours of active cooling for my mirrors.  On better nights, my 6mm is my choice ~320x for Jupiter, Mars, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.  Very rarely I'll go higher with a Powermate.

With my 250px f/4.7 10" dob, I would use a binoviewer at ~208x for planets - which worked great too.  The 15" beats it even though mono;) I've some challenges reaching focus with the binoviewer in my 15", unfortunately. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Xilman
      At long last I have managed to image Caliban, also known as Uranus XVI. It is a small (circa 72km) outer satellite of Uranus which was discovered in September 1997 using the Hale 5m telescope at Palomar. Incidentally, Sycorax (U-XVII)was discovered in the same observing session.  That satellite is around 1.7 magnitude brighter and so much easier to observe.
      Although a  three hours exposure, unfiltered for maximum sensitivity, was used the signal to noise ratio is barely 3 and serious image processing was needed to produce a relatively clear image. Even so, it is not especially obvious. The reason is that the MPOC ephemeris predicts that the satellite has a magnitude of 22.2 at the time of observation. More information is available at http://www.astropalma.com/Projects/Satellites/caliban.html

    • By alanjgreen
      Just bagged 10 minutes between the clouds and got to see the Mercury shadow transit!
      Its so long since I used the Lunt that I took a few seconds to get back into the groove of tuning the double stack and letting some air into the tuner as it was flat.
      Not much else on the disc - 3 x sets of proms, 3 tiny filaments, saw one small bright flux patch briefly.
      But the Mercury shadow was nice and clear and a decent sized patch too.
      Just got back inside before it started spotting with rain! Fingers crossed for another clear patch later ...
    • By ian61
      We are hoping to observe the transit in school (Don’t panic - we have done several transits and partial eclipses in the past so we are fine on the safety aspects - thanks). However does anyone know how I can get hold of some links to use in advance of the day that we can use to put some professional feeds up on the large screen tellies we have linked up to the computer systems these days – I am told that links on YouTube are the easiest to handle on the slightly clunky system we have to control them.
      My question comes from reminiscing with colleges that my daughter and I had stayed up to watch first contact of the last transit of Venus live from Hawaii before swapping to Mt Wilson. (We were also up before dawn on top of the local hill fort as the sun rose having lugged an old 4” reflector up there.) Of course at the time we were just browsing through the internet not taking good note of sites we were on.
    • By Lucas_M
      Hi all,
      This is my third Uranus capture this season. I am much happier with this result.
      The seeing helped a lot and the sky quality was favorable.
      This image is the result of 5 de-rotated videos on Winjupos, all captured with IR742 filter. The result was used as luminance in the composition. RGB came from a normal color capture.
      Following the images of other friends, we can notice the atmospheric activity on the planet. It seems to be changing every week. Many changes can still happen until the opposition.
      Lucas Magalhaes

    • By Piero
      I'm currently on my annual leave in Italy and the sky has been clear all day with no air turbulence.
      The telescope is out - of course - and I managed a session before dinner.
      I thought about sharing some photos taken with my phone and a couple of sketches.


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.