Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Dark Nebulas in Cepheus and M101


mftoet

Recommended Posts

There's a saying which goes 'God created the world, but the Dutch created the Netherlands'. One of those creations is the 'Afsluitdijk', a dyke that separates the North Sea from the 'IJsselmeer' (a lake that used to be the South Sea). Halfway the dyke there's a turning point where the sky darkness can reach Magnitude 21.6 per sqr. arcsec. October 2017 was the last time I visited the turning point on the Afsluitdijk. Because the weather has been very nice in the Netherlands since last Monday and because of the young Moon at the beginning of this week, I packed my equipment to enjoy a beautiful evening with good seeing and transparency. While my scope was gathering photons, I joined a fellow observer with his 45 cm Dobson. Spiral arms in M51 and M81 were spectacular!

2018-04-17_breezanddijk-X3.jpg

I had a new camera to try out: a Nikon D810a. I started at 23h00 (moment of astronomical darkness) with M101. After an hour Cepheus was already pretty high in the sky and I had some objects just east of the 'house' that the bright stars of Cepheus form on my short list: LDN 1089, 1094 & 1100, LBN 444 & 447 and Sh2-130.

Both images have been shot with my Epsilon-180ED on Mach1 and guided (and dithered) with a Lacerta MGEN. 5 minutes subs on ISO 200. 1 hour of integration time on M101, 2 hours of integrations time on LDN 1089 etc.

ldn1100_20180418-X3.jpg

ldn1100_20180418_annotated-X3.jpg

m101_11x300s_20180417_crop-X3.jpg

m101_11x300s_20180417-X3.jpg

Thanks for watching!

 

    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments. In the meantime I've update the images: a little more noise reduction in the images of the Cepheus dark clouds and colour balance / white balance correction in the M101 image.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks again. An f-ratio of 2.8 helps a lot. It's about 3.2 faster than an FSQ-106 (that has approximately the same focal length, so fair to compare f-ratio myth wise). Using a Nikon D810a also helps. Some 6 years advance in camera technology (I used to own a Canon 5D Mark II) is clearly visible. Though 20 years of experience in astrophotography is what matters most. You have to make lots of mistakes to become a good (astro)photographer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, mftoet said:

Thanks again. An f-ratio of 2.8 helps a lot. It's about 3.2 faster than an FSQ-106 (that has approximately the same focal length, so fair to compare f-ratio myth wise). Using a Nikon D810a also helps. Some 6 years advance in camera technology (I used to own a Canon 5D Mark II) is clearly visible. Though 20 years of experience in astrophotography is what matters most. You have to make lots of mistakes to become a good (astro)photographer.

Great shot.  I will soon be trying an FSQ 106 at F3 (.6x reducer).  If this is any indication of what I am in for...bring it on!

Rodd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.