Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Gina's DIY All Sky Camera - Mark 4 - with ZWO ASI185MC


Gina

Recommended Posts

I think I'll start the new thread for the ASI178MM when I get the RPi working.  I may produce a separate daytime ASC later on.  A lower resolution and less sensitivity would be adequate for this and I'd like to cover the whole sky with no missing bits so I'll probably go back to the Fujinon zoom lens.  Not sure which camera but I might keep the ASI185MC for planetary imaging which was what I originally bought it for and use the QHY5-IIC which shows bad noise at low light levels but is alright at higher levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 298
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Latest image.  Been fiddling with camera controls and had to go over to SharpCap with it's zoom feature to get a half-decent picture when binned 2x2.  This image is 20s.  The moon is still a bit of a nuisance but gradually sinking in the SW.  North is at the top.  I'm hoping to catch some Persieds later.

ASI178MM in AMCao on mast 05.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gina said:

catch some Persieds later.

I was just about to post a 'thank you' for your earlier pic of a clear sky, alerting me to 'maybe' for tonight, cos yes ! outside I now see a 1/2 clear sky ( was 0/0 a few hrs ago ) so fingers and everything xxed :)

and was just about to ask if your system could ( had) see meteors at what mag. but you are telepathic and already on the job ! Good luck :)

goes back outside >>>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was watching the live image from the ASC and just seen a Persied :)  Very bright with a comet like shape.  I was increasing the max auto-exposure to 30s to show the Milky way better but since the trace was so bright I'll reduce it again to catch more - maybe.

ASI178MM in AMCao on mast 07.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched the video from last night.  Unfortunately, the video recording I thought was running when I saw that one Persied, actually wasn't :(  But the video was recording for the rest of the night but no Persieds and it soon clouded over completely.  One short gap between clouds but no meteors.

The only way I seem to be able to use 2x2 binning is to reduce the resolution and then the captured image covers even less of the full sky.  With the Milky Way showing well almost right down to the horizon it seems a pity not to be able to capture that bottom bit.  For best star capture I shall need the maximum exposure the software/camera can provide of 60s with 2x2 binning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ASI178MM is not performing as well as I thought it might.  I think the reason is the small pixel size of 2.4 microns maybe the ASI174MM with 5.86 micron pixels would have been better with more than twice the size.  The sensor is bigger too and the FOV would fit on the sensor.  I'll have to give this some serious thought. 

The ASI178MM with it's small pixels might be good for planetary if I'm prepared to accept mono images.  OTOH a higher resolution mono image might have some appeal over a lower resolution colour one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having a clock that shows the phase of the moon is nice but I think I want a dial that shows moonrise and moonset times as well.  OH NO Not another project :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/08/2016 at 10:59, Gina said:

The ASI178MM is not performing as well as I thought it might.  I think the reason is the small pixel size of 2.4 microns maybe the ASI174MM with 5.86 micron pixels would have been better with more than twice the size.  The sensor is bigger too and the FOV would fit on the sensor.  I'll have to give this some serious thought. 

The ASI178MM with it's small pixels might be good for planetary if I'm prepared to accept mono images.  OTOH a higher resolution mono image might have some appeal over a lower resolution colour one.

Further to this, the ASI174MM will not do, it has different dimensions (for some strange reason best known to ZWO!!).  It is quite unlike ZWO's other offerings.  The back focus is increased by 5mm and the main housing won't allow a fisheye lens to be placed close enough to get focus.  What a pity - otherwise this would have been a great camera.

ASI174 Body cf ASI120 01.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems the ASI178MM may be the best choice after all but the high noise level at high gain means I shall want to cool it.  Currently the box just fits perfectly with the bottom against the mast attachment and the top against the top of the camera.  I shall need to gain 4.8mm for the thickness of the Peltier TEC. 

I could turn that amount off the mast attachment but that's a very long-winded operation with my rather inadequate lathe so I plan to enlarge the hole in the top of the case to allow the camera to poke out a bit.  A few other alterations such as raising the dome a bit will also be needed.

This diagram shows the current arrangement with the hole in the case top clearing the lens.  I shall cut it bigger so that the camera body can poke through.  The Peltier TEC will go between the camera base and the aluminium mast attachment (of course).

Box 05.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.