lensman57 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Hi A.G.I guess if I was tempted into imaging at some stage that's the way I'd go. In all honesty, I'd probably buy something cheaply (like a lifecam), accept it's limitations, see how much I liked imaging and then invest in a dedicated astro-imaging camera if I was taken with the concept. I suppose the key to that approach is accepting limitations early on and accordingly not being disheartened with the results, especially with the amount of post-processing to learn.To date the equpiment I have, and have recently invested in, is geared purely towards visual.~KeithHi Keith,This is a very sensible way of going about it, regretably with AP there are no short cuts.Regards,A.G Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaybee Posted January 17, 2014 Author Share Posted January 17, 2014 I'd certainly be picking a direction (DS or planetary - I understand the two have different requirements) and starting from scratch should I decide on AP with a 'scope at some stage. For the last 12/18 months I have been observing with binoculars and have just invested in a widefield visual grab 'n go setup of EQ2 and ST102 (that arrives tomorrow! ). I've played with lunar photography using my DSLR and 500mm lens on a tripod, stacking the results with registax and playing with wavelets. I have some results I'm pleased with and I'm sure there's more I could achieve with better sky conditions and some more refined camera setup. When I'm home later I'll post my latest efforts.~Keith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leelee970 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 I personally think the SPC or similar webcam is the way to start off. What you are prepared to pay for such an item is dependent of the old bank account. There are a lot of other factors to consider – the amount of time a person can get at the scope, the weather and how dedicated you are. Take small steps and if it’s the hobby for you then upgrade – after all there is always someone willing to pay silly money for your old kit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSM Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 I personally think the SPC or similar webcam is the way to start off. What you are prepared to pay for such an item is dependent of the old bank account. There are a lot of other factors to consider – the amount of time a person can get at the scope, the weather and how dedicated you are. Take small steps and if it’s the hobby for you then upgrade – after all there is always someone willing to pay silly money for your old kit. Exactly! That's the way I have been going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inedible_hulk Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 I personally think the SPC or similar webcam is the way to start off.What you are prepared to pay for such an item is dependent of the old bank account.There are a lot of other factors to consider – the amount of time a person can get at the scope, the weather and how dedicated you are.Take small steps and if it’s the hobby for you then upgrade – after all there is always someone willing to pay silly money for your old kit. Couldn't agree more! And if it's not for you it's still great for the occasional quick snap to share with friends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikehab Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 It's worth noting that there are other old Philips webcams in the same 'range' that also use exacty the same CCD chip as the SPC900 - e.g. the PCVC840K which can produce similar results. I got mine for £25 (including asto 1.25" nosepiece), and they can also be upgraded to the same SPC900 firmware pretty easily.... Cheers,Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Presland Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 very nice mike! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.