Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

ASI120MM Windows 7 Help please


Recommended Posts

I am the lucky owner of an ASI120MM camera courtesy of my better half at Christmas.

A while ago, I think on here, I read something about needing to "disable driver registration on boot up" before installing the driver disk on my laptop which operates on Windows 7.

Please can somebody tell me how to do this, step by step if possible. I am hoping it is straightforward!

Many thanks

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am the lucky owner of an ASI120MM camera courtesy of my better half at Christmas.

A while ago, I think on here, I read something about needing to "disable driver registration on boot up" before installing the driver disk on my laptop which operates on Windows 7.

Please can somebody tell me how to do this, step by step if possible. I am hoping it is straightforward!

Many thanks

Bob

The latest driver just works out of the box, the earlier versions needed driver signature disabling, While you are at it install  the Ascom deivers as well you never know when you need them.

Regards,

A.G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest driver just works out of the box, the earlier versions needed driver signature disabling, While you are at it install  the Ascom deivers as well you never know when you need them.

Regards,

A.G

Thanks A.G I will do just that :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also don't forget that in sharpcap there will be two entries for the cam ... Use the top one , it has more options and will go up to 60 fps at 640 x 480

Surely it will give more than this? I getting 112fps from my qhy @ 8 bit 640x480 and sure the ASI's were pushing similar or even better?

typed on my mobile with Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it will give more than this? I getting 112fps from my qhy @ 8 bit 640x480 and sure the ASI's were pushing similar or even better?

typed on my mobile with Tapatalk

Think it depends on my laptop ...

Just pointing out that one of the entries in sharpcap is very basic and only does about 30 fps whereas the other goes significantly higher .

Firecapture seems faster too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think it depends on my laptop ...

Just pointing out that one of the entries in sharpcap is very basic and only does about 30 fps whereas the other goes significantly higher .

Firecapture seems faster too

Sorry Knobby not intended to be as abrupt as it reads - all my concentration on one finger on screen keybd. Disk io may definitely impose a limit on older laptops/netbooks - though a RAM disk can speed things up if the device and OS support.

typed on my mobile with Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Knobby not intended to be as abrupt as it reads - all my concentration on one finger on screen keybd. Disk io may definitely impose a limit on older laptops/netbooks - though a RAM disk can speed things up if the device and OS support.

typed on my mobile with Tapatalk

No offence taken :-)

I'll look into RAM disk ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fps will be very dependent on the exposure time. Your maximum fps = 1000/exp_time_in_ms.

e.g. if your exposure time is 20ms the max fps is 50. If you can up the gain and reduce your exp time to 10ms you should be able to get fps around 100.

If you push the gain too far it gets noisy but that could be eliminated by stacking. It's a balancing act - you need to experiment with different settings to see what works best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it will give more than this? I getting 112fps from my qhy @ 8 bit 640x480 and sure the ASI's were pushing similar or even better?

I don't think you can get much better than that with USB2.  Looking at the practical maximum data throughput (as opposed to the theoretical maximum) the link is saturated once you get much over 100fps at 640x480 unless you start compressing the frame.

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're certainly getting towards usb2 saturation at 100FPS 640x480x8bit, I think ZWO claim 113FPS as max frame rate for this resolution - which would need sub 9ms exposures.  I think I was capturing Luminance on Jupiter at 3800mm with a 75% histogram at around 5.6ms to give 6000 frames in 58 seconds.   The FPS figure returned by FC varies during the capture, but the rate at start of the capture is recorded in the log.    At smaller ROI's you should be able to sustain higher frame rates provided the target is bright enough.     

ZWO figures for this are here - http://www.zwoptical.com/Eng/cameras/ASI120/index.asp, though real world performance will depend on the device, usb chipset and contention on shared usb controllers.

I'm generally happy if I can keep the frame rate above 60FPS for blue channel with 50% gain (gain control is not truely linear with the QHY camera, there's a definite multiplier above 90%, so percentages should be taken with a pinch of salt) and 75-80% histogram - Saturn last year was a considerably harder target and my blue channel frame rates were frequently sub 30FPS even with max gain!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.