Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Tele Vue Paracorr Type 2 Comma Corrector


bartonv

Recommended Posts

I am thinking of purchasing this item form Orion for my 10" reflector with the primary purpose of shorting my focal length. I want to do some astrophotography and cannot reach primary focus(within 2-3 mm). Does anyone know if it will do this if at all? My focal length is 1200mm. I know a barlow will but I also want to get the comma correcting effect.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only member I know uses a Paracorr is Moonshane, he knows about these things. I thought a PC only increased the focal length myself. I do not know if he is a SGL 8 as many site members will be, so you may have to wait a while for an answer.

Televue will be a good choice but pricey

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the T1 paracorr but I think they are the same in this respect. the focal length is actually increased by 15% so your scope would become a 1380mm f5.5. rather bizarrely, the paracorr also takes the focal plane IN by about 18mm. therefore if you just need a bit more in focus it might help but it won't create a wider field (in fact the opposite).

moving the primary up the tube is a cheaper way to get in focus but if you want a wider field, for AP, you'd be better buying a smaller frac or newt and in fact a 10" newt is not really a great tool for AP unless you have a seriously good mount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does the MPCC work? Considering this myself as I dont have paracorr money. Want to see how the eyepieces I have in the post perform first but I suspect I might want a coma corrector if it's something I dont have to screw to every eyepiece like a filter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no experience with the MPCC. The older verison was not well suited to visual use, but the new one should be a good as any. It may be possible to configure it up like the GSO coma corrector which I wrote about here but spacing is going to be more critical because of the smaller back focus distance, 55mm vs 75mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi all! :)

After a lot of reading here and there, I am still not sure if the TV Paracorr Type-2 is worth it (in terms of price/performance ratio) for imaging.

It seems that pretty much everybody is using it mainly for visual...

At first, I was considering the Baader MPCC Mark III, but it seems it is not that good at all:

http://www.pleiades.hu/tesztek_csillagaszat/korrektorok_1.html

The Paracorr 2 is pretty pricey, but if it is worth it... I am currently leaning towards it.

I intend to use it with a SW Quattro 8s + TSOAG9 + Canon EOS 600Da

So, what do you think about the Paracorr 2 for imaging?

PS: I am currently imaging with a SW 200p + SW CC and when there is some bright star in the FoV, I get some nasty reflections. How is the Paracorr performing in that aspect?

Thanks!

Ivan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A general rule of thumb about coma correctors is that magnification is added to reduce spherical aberration.  SA isn't important for imaging, but it definitely counts in visual observing.

Baader MPCC-0% increase in focal length

Explore Scientific HRCC--6% increase (requires 32mm of in-focus)

GSO/Astrotech coma corrector--10% increase

TeleVue Paracorr--15% increase

All the latest versions of the above are usable below f/4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.