sameer Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Hi,I recently purchased a skywatcher telescope with this configuration Aperture 76mm Mirror Focal Length 700mm Focal Ratio f/9.2 It came with 25mm and 10mm Plossl eye pieces. It's supposed to have a maximum useful magnification of 150x.Using a 4mm will give me 175x, so should I go with the Plossl or buy a good quality Barlow? Please help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hwsoderlund Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Hi,I recently purchased a skywatcher telescope with this configuration Aperture 76mm Mirror Focal Length 700mm Focal Ratio f/9.2 It came with 25mm and 10mm Plossl eye pieces. It's supposed to have a maximum useful magnification of 150x.Using a 4mm will give me 175x, so should I go with the Plossl or buy a good quality Barlow? Please help.I would get a Barlow. A 4 mm Plossl is going to have very tight eye relief, which means you would have to literally press your eye against the eyepiece to get the full field of view. It is quite uncomfortable. With your existing eyepieces and the Barlow you would effectively have 25mm = 28x, 12.5mm = 56x, 10mm = 70x and 5mm = 140x. That should be plenty with your scope. After that you might think about following up with another Plossl in the 7-8mm range to give you something in between 70x and 140x. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swamp thing Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 This is one that will get mixed opinions. Some peolple dislike using Barlow lenses whilst others swear by them.Some dislike the extra faff involved when using them, others have been put off by shoddy cheap optics.Some like the cost effectiveness of not needing the extra eyepieces that a Barlow affords you, others like the smaller eyepiece case Personally I love em. They mean every time I buy an eyepiece I get two for the price of one.One piece of advice, if you do decide on going with a Barlow lens, buy the very best one you can (make sure it's a 2" one too). Your eyepiece case will see several different eyepieces throughout your observing life, but a good barloiw will serve you for life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capricorn Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 The might say a maximum magnification of 150x but I seriously suspect that you will not get that.100x may be possible and if the scope is well set up and eyepiece works well with the scope then 120x.I would not consider a 4mm plossl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hwsoderlund Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 One piece of advice, if you do decide on going with a Barlow lens, buy the very best one you can (make sure it's a 2" one too).Generally that is good advice, but I don't think Sameer's scope has a 2" focuser. @Sameer: I think you have this scope, am I right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ganymede12 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 I'd suggest a Barlow as it effectively doubles the amount of eyepieces you have. I was lucky, my Mercury707 came with it's own Barlow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul schofield Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 I would go down the Barlow route personally, being that the use it will get with all your eyepieces will far outweigh buying a 4mm e.p. Good luck and make sure you get a good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fordos Moon Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Just checking if the EPs you have are inch and a quarter you need an inch and a quarter Barlow correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cantharis Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Just checking if the EPs you have are inch and a quarter you need an inch and a quarter Barlow correct?A two inch Barlow will probably come with a 2" to 1.25" adaptor, which you can use with your 1.25" eyepieces. But should you later get some 2" eps, you will need a 2" Barlow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukeSkywatcher Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 I may be wrong, but for this scope i think a 2x barlow would be the best bet. A 4mm EP is a struggle at the best of times and i think it would be even more of a struggle with 76mm aperture? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earth titan Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 TBH with the set up you have, I would go for a larger plossl rather than a barlow. Reasons for this:The 10mm EP that ships with the scopes, is, regrettably, of very dubious quality. Doubling this to 5 mm would be pointless.Doubling the 25 will get you to 12, so not far off the current 10mm.The size of the scope won't allow massive amounts of magnification.Personally I would go for something around the 35mm+ mark. Get some nice widefield views which will the scope will be best at.Typed by me on my fone, using fumms... Excuse eny speling errurs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sameer Posted October 21, 2012 Author Share Posted October 21, 2012 Thank you all for the suggestion and replies. I did as the consensus said, buy a good quality barlow. Hence, I bought a 2x achromatic Barlow lens and it works like a charm.Once again, thanks a lot people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sameer Posted October 21, 2012 Author Share Posted October 21, 2012 @Nebula Yes you are right! That is the same telescope that I have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.