Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Stu

Moderators
  • Posts

    33,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    432

Everything posted by Stu

  1. Never Smart phone messing around is all I am likely to do, although, now you mention it, I could stick a DSLR on it.....
  2. Worry yee not Derek, just for ultra grab and go visual use
  3. This arrived today. Have been wanting one for a while, very lovely ‘chunky’ little thing, feels very nicely made. Focuser is very smooth and it is incredibly compact with the retractable dewshield. It reminds me of a more up to date, slightly bigger version of my old WO SD66 and will hopefully come everywhere with me, to places the Tak dare not go (or rather fit!)
  4. My recent experience with my OMC140 emphasises your point John. Before it was fettled by Es it was showing some fairly ropey star images and variable detail on planets, sometimes good, sometimes bad. Now that the primary is fixed correctly, the corrector is not over tightened and it is collimated, the views are significantly better. It just goes to show that fine tuning these scopes is well worth doing, to pin down the contrast and detail we all enjoy. EDIT To add too, my Heritage 130P is nicely collimated currently and it really does show.
  5. I guess Skywatcher are still making a decent profit on this. The shame is that the price competition online has squeezed retailer margins, and now customers are having to pay more to ensure a product which is up to scratch which doesn’t seem quite right somehow.
  6. Indeed backs are rubbish! Very grumpy making at times. Hope it improves soon Jules
  7. What a shame John. So much anticipation and potential, let down by the manufacturer. Fair play to FLO for shipping out unchecked scopes, this sort of thing, and your honest reporting, will help to identify the problems quickly and we can only hope that they fix them as quickly. Seems that FLO and other retailers need to be doing 100% checking on these at the moment
  8. Shane makes a very good point. A number of issues with theses sorts of scopes only show themselves in more extreme conditions. Nice warm summer evenings are not really going to challenge the cell at all. You have just made a very good case for a longer term loan
  9. Why do I have visions of John's arms and legs poking out from underneath a large scope at the bottom of the garden?
  10. Hope you didn’t get buried in one John, you’ve been awful quiet
  11. Shame, a first light post to celebrate the 40k would have been very apt but let’s not wait for that Looking promising John.
  12. @John now you are just teasing us Hopefully the weather will settle down!
  13. Not seen those before Derek, is it even smaller than the Mini Ercole? Looks interesting. It has a little more height than my Giro-WR so probably won’t need a pillar of any sort to avoid tripod leg clashes! Nice, although I do see the white is a little unusual. Can’t see it in the dark though I guess
  14. Not sure that’s the case Phil, would be interesting to find out though hopefully it is not something which will need touching. Great pictures @John, it sits very nicely on the Ercole along side the 120ED. I can see you are going to have some fun with those two plus the LZOS Out of interest, do you have two similar diagonals so you can rule out that contributing to any differences you see?
  15. Binoviewer and eyepieces I expect
  16. Something a little different. An old pair of Chinon Countryman 7x35 wide angle. They are specced at 11 degrees, but I think 10 is more realistic. A kind gentleman from this forum 3D printed some filter holders for me so I have OIII and UHC on here, nice for the NAN and other widefield targets. The moon was bright last night (obviously!) But I still got some nice hints of the NAN with these.
  17. You have my sympathy Paul, been there myself for quite a while with just a set of BGOs, a 24 Pan and a Nag zoom but you will manage. Those big bad boys will come back to you in time
  18. I’m making some progress with this which I will share soon.
  19. That looks an excellent addition Piero. I think the Docter might be next on my list! I still recall it showing me 5 moons around Saturn in my Tak, no scatter at all!!
  20. Thanks Piero, I’m looking forward to using it. I only use Binoviewers for high power now, and have the Nag Zoom if I do cyclops but the Docter is definitely on my list to reacquire too
  21. Been a long time since I posted in here. This is a bit of a temporary solution, but I’m back in the 2” game, which is fun. The thing on the right is an extension tube for the Tak when used with a 1.25” Prism.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.