Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


David Levi

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

576 Excellent

About David Levi

  • Rank
    Star Forming

Profile Information

  • Location
  1. Approaching the topic from a less serious angle, any telescope that you can't lift on your own. That's a serious telescope.
  2. I'm going on Saturday as well with a ticket to see Carolin Crawford.
  3. I heard recently (can't remember where - that's another age problem) that age related focusing problems are due to the lens becoming stiffer rather than the muscles attached to the lens becoming weaker.
  4. Great report. Amazing dedication to getting out and observing.
  5. I'm glad you've mentioned that because I've been thinking the same thing about Jupiter during this year's apparition (but failing to mention it!). It's almost as if the north and south equatorial belts are giving off clouds into the area between them making it "less clean".
  6. ... buses. Yes, it's the old joke. You wait ages and then two come along at the same time. So, it was a second night out in a row doing the same session structure; Moon, Jupiter, double stars. Telescope was the 100mm refractor with binoviewers. On the Moon, the craters Aristoteles and Eudoxus looked fantastic. Terrific detail on the ejecta immediately surrounding the craters. On the south western edge of the Mare Serenitatis I had a look at the crater Sulpicius Gallus. It's on the lunar 100 list at number 71 for its dark mantle. It appeared in a darker patch of ground but not sure if that's what you are supposed to see as it wasn't that impressive (there are dark patches in many places) and at number 71 in the list it should be quite hard to see but it wasn't particularly. Further south, close to the terminator the Albufeda Crater Chain provided an interesting view and below that the Pontanus E Concentric Crater was lit up perfectly to see the concentric ring. Apparently, concentric craters are rare away from maria. Proceeding down the terminator further, the overlapping craters of Maurolycus were impressive. Finally near the limb, I had a great view of the crater Boussingault. The inner crater being very clear together with detailed terracing descending to it. I moved on to double stars next. Tonight exploring some more obvious ones in the constellation of Scorpius and low declination Ophiuchus ones. α Sco, Antares, 1/5.5 mag, 2.5" sep, failed to split, although, inspired by another thread I'm coming back to it. β Sco, 2.6/4.9 mag, 13.7" sep ν Sco, 4.0(4.4/5.4) / 6.3(6.7/7.8) mag, 41", A1.4", B2.6", an exciting double double, I could only split the brighter A pair at moments of good seeing. ρ Oph, 4.6(5.0/5.7) / 6.8 / 7.3 mag, 156.3", 151.1, A3.0", what a fantastic 4 star system. The fainter two stars are positioned almost equidistant from the primary at a roughly 90­° angle which makes for a eye pleasing view. ο Oph, 5.1/6.6 mag, 10.1" sep 36 Oph, 5.1, 5.1 mag, 5.0" sep Jupiter had now cleared the rooftops and it gave some really steady but not particularly clear views at approx. 200x magnification. Still a 3/1 split with the Galilean Moons as last night but less of a straight line I would guess. The equatorial bands were obvious and the south polar region was showing some darkness. Nothing really to report in the faint northern polar region. Another enjoyable session.
  7. That's good to know. My location isn't great for low declination observation. SQM is roughly 19.0 at the zenith and of course there's a lot more muck to look through low down on the horizon.
  8. Well done John. I feel a bit disappointed now as I've just come in after failing to split Antares with my Takahashi FC-100D. I tried to see the smaller partner star without knowing its location and after giving up and looking up its position I still couldn't see it or even imagine that I could see it. I was binoviewing at approx. 200x magnification. There was a bit of unsteady atmosphere at that magnification and the diffraction rings weren't helping. It was a fun challenge though and one I will return to now that your experience has shown that it is possible with a 100mm apo refractor.
  9. I did think about looking at Barnard's Star but it's quite faint at mag 9.5. I have observed it before with my reflector so it wasn't a priority last night compared with my double star hunt.
  10. I started the session with a good look at the crescent Moon. Around Mare Serenitatis, the crater Posidonius was looking superb and I enjoyed studying Le Monnier, Plinius and the Serpentine Ridge. I also spotted the dark edges around the sea. In Mare Tranquillitatis, the Arago Domes were quite obvious but I didn't get a good view of the Lamont oval ridges except the ones leading from the oval. I had a look at the twin craters Sabine and Ritter but their best too was yet to come. I think the sun needed to be a bit higher to get a better view inside these. On the outskirts of Mare Nectaris the Altai Scarp was very clear. With Jupiter opposition approaching on the 10th of June and mostly clear skies forecast I was desperate to have a look at the gas giant. Without a view to the east, Jupiter is now rising such that I can see it south east at a reasonable time, about midnight last night. I was using binoviewers at I guess somewhere between 150x and 200x magnification. The seeing was not great. It took me a few seconds to realise that the GRS was in view, although after noticing it, it was quite obvious. Details of the clouds in the equatorial belts weren't very well resolved. The Galilean Moons were well strung out in a three to one split. The highlight of the night for me was the performance of the 100mm refractor, that I was using for the session, on double stars. Again using binoviewers, it just ate them up far better that my 8" reflector. The star shapes, and views without diffraction spikes are just so clean. Colour rendition is also better. I took in the following binary stars. ε Boo, Izar, 2.5/4.9 mag, 2.9" sep, much cleaner and easier split than my 8" reflector λ Oph, 4.2/5.2 mag, 1.6" sep τ Oph, 5.2/5.9 mag, 1.6" sep 61 Oph, 6.2/6.6 mag, 20.7" sep 67 Oph, 4.0/8.1 mag, 54.4" sep 70 Oph, 4.2/6.0 mag, 6.6" sep, nice yellow pair 72 Oph, 3.7/7.5 mag, 297" sep I was really surprised that I could see the split of λ and τ Oph. I did try a look at the globular clusters M10 and M12 but they were very indistinct. Not the correct targets for my location. From the light polluted skies of my suburban back garden a very pleasing session.
  11. I didn't experience the effect last night but I had the problem, if you can call it that, last month. Like you, it happened looking at the heavily cratered area around Clavius. It was so bad at one stage during that particular night that I had problems seeing the craters as concave. They just kept jumping back to convex at almost every viewing after looking away. A curious and confusing at first optical illusion. The mind plays tricks eh.
  12. I've packed up now and didn't see your report about the rille on the floor of the Alpine Valley until now. A challenge for the future. I agree that the Moon was looking fantastic tonight. Spectacularly crisp and clear. The highlight for me was Hesiodus A crater. The two concentric craters showing up well with a half shadow across the craters but with the inner crater rim just about visible all the way around. Other notable views were of the ejecta around Copernicus, the Davy Crater Chain and Lambert R. I had to drag myself away or I would be good for nothing tomorrow. I was bino viewing with the 100mm refractor so I couldn't give an accurate magnification that I was using. Somewhere between 250 and 300x I would imagine.
  13. That's a very neat job. It looks great. Funnily enough, I made a little aluminium plate for my Skywatcher 6x30 finderscope yesterday. First time that I have ever drilled and tapped a hole. In the plate, not the telescope of course. Much more comfortable with the 90 degree finder when I used it last night on the Moon. The adjustment screws on the Skywatcher are so much easier to use than the Takahashi ones.
  14. Yep, stunning shots. Good enough for a sky guide book. Beautiful detail.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.