Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Lee_P

Members
  • Posts

    1,129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Lee_P

  1. Hello and welcome! We're not that far away, I'm in Bristol.
  2. Thanks Annie, that's very kind of you to say.
  3. I've just seen that Askar are releasing a new telescope. Looks quite good! $2495 on AliExpress, not sure that that will translate to in the UK if local suppliers (cough, @FLO?) stock it. http://www.askarlens.com/index.php/17phq/274.html Aperture size:107mm Focal length:749mm Focal ratio:f/7 Objective lens:Quadruplet air-spaced APO (including two ED glass) Image circle:44mm Maximum accessory connection (with the focuser fully retreated): 1. Imaging mode: 79mm (from the base of M48×0.75 male thread) 99mm (from the base of M54×0.75 male thread) 119mm (from the base of M68×1male thread) 149mm (from the base of M86×1 male thread) 2. Observing mode: 120mm (from the end of 2" visual back) Total length:603mm(when the dew shield is contracted) 754mm(when the dew shield is stretched) Net weight:5.7kg Gross weight:6.9kg Rear-end thread type:M86×1 to M68×1 M68×1 to M54×0.75 M54×0.75 to M52×0.75 M52×0.75 to M48×0.75(with M48×0.75 filter thread) Four-piece photographic adapter:M48×0.75 Standard package items:a 107PHQ OTA,a pair of tube rings, a handle, an Askar 300mm Vixen dovetail plate, a set of four-piece photographic adapters, a manual
  4. I print photos too (I'm a professional photographer) and also use an Epson XP-15000. (It has six ink tanks though, not the four you mention)? A top tip is that printers have profiles that match brightness, saturation etc. to the printer and photo paper that you use. This makes a *huge* difference, far more than you'd be forgiven for thinking. I use Epson Premium Photo printer, like you have on order, and it's great. I do all my printing through Lightroom, and it makes loading printer / paper profiles a breeze, (see screenshot below) plus has a soft proofing mode that helps you to match what you see on the screen to what will come out of your printer. Once you get all those things set up, you don't need to be giving extra boosts to vibrance and saturation.
  5. Thanks! Haha, I guess that's one way of putting it!
  6. Ah, so your QHY9 is mono? That would make a difference considering the QHY8L Sabalias is considering is OSC. A whole other can of worms to be opened..!
  7. That's the question! Depends on your finances and how much you want to put into the hobby, I guess. @Rustang's photo is very impressive, and certainly shows that the QHY8L is capable of good results when in the right hands.
  8. Thanks! I did try rotating it actually, but didn't like it quite as much. Maybe because I'd spent so much time looking at it the other way around, it just didn't seem right to me 😂
  9. I actually used a QHY8L and 80ED back in 2017. I found them a decent enough pairing, especially coming from the Nikon D700 DSLR I used prior. The camera definitely shows its age when compared to the modern CMOS cameras we have now though. In case it's useful, I've fished out some images I took. My processing skills were in their infancy, so perhaps take these as a kind of lower limit of what you could achieve?
  10. This was a real toughie to process! The end result may be too vivid for some, but I personally quite like the striking palette, and I've never seen the Jellyfish presented in these colours before. As always, the data was gathered with a small refractor and OSC camera under Bortle 8 skies. More info on my website here. * January 2022 * Bristol, UK (Bortle 8 ) * Telescope: Askar FRA400 f/5.6 Quintuplet APO Astrograph * Camera: ZWO ASI 2600MC-PRO * Filter: Optolong L-eXtreme * Mount: Orion Sirius EQ-G * Guide: William Optics 32mm; ZWO ASI 120MM Mini * Control: ASIAIR Plus, ZWO EAF * Software: PixInsight, Lightroom, Topaz DeNoise AI * 600 x 120 seconds Total integration time: 20 hours
  11. I was only allowed there because I was working for English Heritage, and it was all arranged in advance.
  12. I recently ran a few stargazing sessions at Stonehenge -- some cloudy! -- and took a few photos in the short amount of time I had before the participants arrived. It was quite something to be all alone among the stones at night.
  13. Here you go. Stacked using PixInsight, so I hope you have that to open it! https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1b_HA8fBfA6t3GVAe1z6InCDYp5hyE_pp?usp=sharing
  14. Ah, can't say I noticed that. Could be the optics or my processing!
  15. I own the Askar FRA400, so not the one you've shortlisted, but similar. It's very good. Review here.
  16. These were all taken with an ASKAR FRA400 telescope and ASI2600MC PRO camera, from a Bortle 8 city centre.
  17. I think that those are very respectable photos, especially for early efforts! 👏
  18. I follow a similar approach to @DeanCJ -- the same Nevada power supply, plugged into an outdoor mains socket. A cigar adapter splitter goes into the Nevada, and then Lynx Astro cables come out: one for my ASIAIR Plus, and one for my mount. And when needed, one for my flats panel. I keep everything permanently in a waterproof box that lives at the bottom of my telescope pier. (Although the mains extension lead is packed away when not in use). If you always use your kit at home, and have access to mains power, I'd recommend that over batteries. More info and photos here.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.