Jump to content

Narrowband

Lee_P

Members
  • Posts

    1,128
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Lee_P

  1. The weather's been awful lately, so it's taken a long time to produce this image! It's The Flaming Star Nebula, taken using a 2600MC-Pro OSC camera. I image from the centre of a city, so long integration times are a must! This pic is 15 hours of RGB data (Optolong L-Quad Enhance) and 15 hours of Ha/OIII (Optolong L-Ultimate. More info can be found on my website. * 18 January to 3 March 2024 (6.5 weeks) * Bristol, UK (Bortle 8 ) * Telescope: Askar 130PHQ Flatfield Astrograph * Camera: ZWO ASI 2600MC-PRO * Mount: Sky-Watcher EQ6-R PRO * Guide: William Optics 50mm Guidescope with 1.25″ RotoLock; ZWO ASI 120MM Mini * Control: ASIAIR Plus * Software: PixInsight, Lightroom * Filters: – Optolong L-Quad Enhance (RGB) 180 x 300 seconds (15 hours) – Optolong L-Ultimate (Ha/OIII) 180 x 300 seconds (15 hours) Total exposure time: 30 hours By Lee Pullen
  2. Here's the Flaming Star Nebula taken using an OSC camera with an Optolong L-Ultimate filter. It's 15 hours of data from central Bristol (Bortle 8). I've got 15 hours of RGB data to add in too, but that's not allowed in this competition! I'll post it in the Deep Sky forum section when it's done, for anyone that's interested.
  3. Good job! I've never been brave enough to make a mosaic 😂
  4. I've not tried any tri-bands, but nowadays I'm routinely combining Optolong L-Ultimate and Askar D2 data.
  5. Seestars and visual telescopes are very different, so whether it's an alternative for you depends on what you want from the instrument. It's fairer to say that a Seestar complements a visual telescope very well, and vice versa.
  6. Broadband with OSC from Bortle 8 is definitely possible, as I hope these four images show. They weren't taken with any filters either. It does take long integration times however, which the OP said was an issue. Incidentally, I've just tested an Optolong L-Quad Enhance filter, and found it to be quite good under my skies. Review here. If I had the money and time to run multiple rigs though, I'd probably go mono and dedicate each set-up to a different filter.
  7. Lots of good advice here! I'll chip in to say that I've used a 2600MC Pro extensively and found it paired well with an Askar FRA400 telescope. I've written a review of that telescope here, and if you go to my gallery and scroll down a bit then you can see what that combo is capable of (with lots of imaging experience!) You should absolutely be budgeting for accessories as well, as others have mentioned. Note though that the 2600MC Pro has an in-built UV/IR filter, so you don't need to buy one of those. If I can be forgiven for plugging another article on my website, you may get some inspiration for accessories here.
  8. This is great to hear, you're going to have a brilliant time with the 130PHQ and 2600MC Duo!
  9. Ah good timing, I've just added a load more example photos at the end of the review!
  10. Hi Space Cadets, I began reviewing the new Optolong L-Quad Enhance light pollution filter months ago, but unfortunately had to put all my astro endeavors on pause because my 2600MC Pro camera broke! (If you're interested in the process of sending a broken camera to ZWO, click here...) Anyhow, I've now finished reviewing the filter, and (spoiler alert) I actually found it to be quite good. Please click here for the whole review. Here's a short integration (just 6 hours 24 minutes) taken using this filter under Bortle 8 skies:
  11. I've just finished a guide to using a Seestar for public outreach star parties. This seems like a good place to plug it! It contains some suggested accessory upgrades, example astro targets, set-up diagrams for two different scenarios, and a list of science communication tips for facilitators. I hope it'll be useful to Seestar users!
  12. I haven't bothered with one and it's been fine. The lens is safely tucked away when the telescope's not in use.
  13. I've been using this little telescope for a few weeks now and have written a review. I hope it may be of use! https://urbanastrophotography.com/index.php/2023/12/05/review-zwo-seestar-s50/
  14. I've just finished my review, with focus on its use from a city: https://urbanastrophotography.com/index.php/2023/12/05/review-zwo-seestar-s50/
  15. Broadband is not a problem. I don't even use a filter. Loads of examples in my gallery. Here are three:
  16. You'd need to put a bit more time into each target compared to my skies, but DSO from London is achievable.
  17. Thanks for the mentions. Yes, I image from the centre of Bortle 8 Bristol -- not quite as bad as London, but in the same ballpark! I use an OSC camera. For narrowband I use an Optolong L-Ultimate and Askar D2 filters. For broadband targets I don't use any filters at all. Lots of example photos here: https://urbanastrophotography.com/index.php/gallery/ There are plenty of tips if you browse that website. The "secret" is to aim for long integration times to combat light pollution -- think 20+ hours. This is very achievable if you have an imaging rig that's easy to set-up and pack down. I typically produce an image every 2 - 8 weeks. (But not right now as my camera is broken and with ZWO in China for repairs!) I'm happy to answer any specific questions you may have.
  18. Thanks, it needs more subframes really, but I agree that it's surprising how much dust can be seen. You should definitely try, your processing skills are obviously up to the challenge. You could try GraXpert to help with your gradients. Ha, alas no-one has stumped up the suggested amount... yet!
  19. Thanks, it won't win any awards but just the fact that it can be imaged from a city is a bit mind blowing!
  20. For sure, it was a real balancing act of controlling the noise without completely destroying the detail. I'd like to have put more hours into it, but I need to move onto another target so I can fairly review the L-Quad filter. Still, I'm happy considering how faint it is!
  21. This target is very tricky from city skies! I integrated 24 hours of data, but to be honest it needed more. 14 hours are using the new Optolong L-Quad Enhance (review coming soon!) and 10 hours were with no filter. More info on my website, and imaging details are below. * 22 September to 15 October 2023 * Bristol, UK (Bortle 8 ) * Telescope: Askar 130PHQ Flatfield Astrograph * Camera: ZWO ASI 2600MC-PRO * Mount: Sky-Watcher EQ6-R PRO * Guide: William Optics 50mm Guidescope with 1.25″ RotoLock; ZWO ASI 120MM Mini * Control: ASIAIR Plus * Software: PixInsight, Lightroom * Filters: – No filter 300 x 120 seconds (10 hours) – Optolong L-Quad 420 x 120 seconds (14 hours) Total exposure time: 24 hours By Lee Pullen
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.