Congressional Oversight Committee on UAP's

[Mr H in Yorkshire]

2 hours ago, Mark2022 said:

I am what most would term a full blown "Conspiracy theorist" and  find this thread fascinating but, unfortunately, due to 'rules' and the wish not to offend anyone,  I must, essentially, shut up. 

In defence of SGL policy, free speech is not constrained, you can state your daftest/most sensible ideas as you so wish, and some might be offended and disagree. My experience is this is all permissible as long as the language used does not itself get offensive. What is constrained is subject matter, especially religion and politics, because these lead, inevitably, to controversial and increasingly heated remarks, which is emphatically not what SGL is about. 

[Mr Spock]

I've just edited a couple of posts to remove politics and conspiracy references. Please stay on topic and avoid those subjects. Thank you.

[Mark2022]

3 hours ago, Mr H in Yorkshire said:

In defence of SGL policy, free speech is not constrained, you can state your daftest/most sensible ideas as you so wish, and some might be offended and disagree. My experience is this is all permissible as long as the language used does not itself get offensive. What is constrained is subject matter, especially religion and politics, because these lead, inevitably, to controversial and increasingly heated remarks, which is emphatically not what SGL is about. 

I defend their policy too. Just making a point about things in general these days. God, if SGL were a free for all re topics, it would soon be a mess and not worth visiting. A bit of tongue in cheek never harmed anyone, however.  😁

[Mr H in Yorkshire]

5 hours ago, Mark2022 said:

A bit of tongue in cheek never harmed anyone

But easier to misunderstand than straight dialogue.