Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Jupiter 31 October 2022


BGazing

Recommended Posts

Well, this took some time to process. I shook of covid just enough to drag myself to the balcony and capture these - another night of high pressure good seeing. You know it is good when you see details on a relatively still FC screen.

C8, ASI 678, ADC. Single images are out of stacks of 3 mins where I stacked between 65 and 75 percent of frames. Video is about 85 minutes of Jupiter rotation.

 

2022-10-31-1819_8-u-l-jup_exposure=9.png

2022-10-31-1804_5-u-l-jup_exposure=10.png

2022-10-31.gif

2022-10-31-1832_8-u-l-jup_exposure=9.png

Edited by BGazing
  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice images! Yeah could try to deal with the ghosted limb by using an elliptical selection tool (just inside the disk), invert and feather it and then apply a slight Gaussian blur. That’s what i do when I get that artefact and it works well. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CraigT82 said:

Very nice images! Yeah could try to deal with the ghosted limb by using an elliptical selection tool (just inside the disk), invert and feather it and then apply a slight Gaussian blur. That’s what i do when I get that artefact and it works well. 

Thank you for the comment and the suggestion. Honestly, PS was for me quite an obstacle, I might devote more time to it eventually. I only started imaging planets in August. There's some tutorial about removing rind floating around, will try to get a hang of it. Frankly, here it is bearable, it is much more pronounced on Mars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BGazing said:

Thank you for the comment and the suggestion. Honestly, PS was for me quite an obstacle, I might devote more time to it eventually. I only started imaging planets in August. There's some tutorial about removing rind floating around, will try to get a hang of it. Frankly, here it is bearable, it is much more pronounced on Mars.

Processing is a pretty big part of a good image, but so is the data.

You have really good data here, even more can be teased out in terms of detail if color management is a bit tweaked:
image.png.39080a430fa08752123599a6772cb8c1.png

(this is last image tweaked for correct gamma setting for sRGB, contrast / brightness and things like that).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

Processing is a pretty big part of a good image, but so is the data.

You have really good data here, even more can be teased out in terms of detail if color management is a bit tweaked:
image.png.39080a430fa08752123599a6772cb8c1.png

(this is last image tweaked for correct gamma setting for sRGB, contrast / brightness and things like that).

 

Thank you, what did you actually do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, BGazing said:

Thank you, what did you actually do?

Just a few tweaks in IrfanView (of all image processing software).

I changed gamma to 2.2 (that is same as slightly bumping the curves - most people don't do it but it should be done with raw/linear data), reduced brightness and increased contrast (or rather set black and white point appropriately). Increased saturation to get nice brown / orange for GRS and did one round of stock sharpening in that software.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.