Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Re-editing my first nebula DSLR image - M42


Recommended Posts

So, i've only been imaging for 3 months, but I've come on quite a bit in that time- mostly on the processing and editing front - thanks in no small part to people on here pointing me in the right direction.

So I thought I'd apply some of those lessons learned to my first image I took other than the moon with my DSLR -M42 back on 13th March with my 1200D and a 300mm SLR lens.

First is the original edit I probably posted back then:

 

 

 

1303.orion.thumb.jpg.34f253fa69fc824e8c4aa2aec6235757.jpg

 

 

And now there-edit using startools, and new techniques I've learned as I've got to grips with using Affinity:

 

1303.orion_21_06.20reedit.thumb.jpg.ea8cfa6e6df128137700141abc332de7.jpg

Maybe not night and day, and still not wonderful, but it does show it's worth keeping learning - and that taking the raw data is only 1/2 the job.

stu

Edited by powerlord
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • powerlord changed the title to Re-editing my first nebula DSLR image - M42
2 hours ago, Chefgage said:

I prefere the first one. The stars are sharper and the nebula more softer/pleasing to the eye.

yeh not sure what i did to screw up the stars. back to the drawing board. needs the best of both.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is certainly some good data there and with a bit of tweaking you should be able to get the result you want.

Looking at the second image there is certainly more detail but also more noise (as you would expect). I found with Startools that for many subjects the Autodev function had a tendency to slightly over-stretch the data and even after de-noise there would still be a lot of noise. Two options really. Firstly when running the de-noise module push the grain size up quite a bit. It will soften the image but give a better overall result. The other option (which I often use with ST) is to run a manual develop and not push the data quite so far. I have found the final results slightly more pleasing.

Also, if you are using Affinity you could use the Astroflat pro plug-in, or just run a denoise routine . Both of these might help your final image.

Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.