Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

M31: Study of core structues


Rodd

Recommended Posts

Long story short, I had used the TOA 130 and about 1.5 hours of 20 sec green subs to try and map dark structures in and around the core of M31.  I then inserted this data as a luminance into my HaLRGB image of M31 taken with the FSQ and .6x reducer.  Here are the results.  I had one with a little dimmer core, but I think this version picks up on the spherical nature of the structures more.--but its not as smooth.  What the heck--I will post both  I waffle back and forth.  Please disregard the artifacts apparent in the core--it was a tricky operation and I just couldn't fix everything

 

Brighter core

M21crop3b-alt.thumb.jpg.ed8aa6bcf837daa2654dcef1e6ca6a1b.jpg

 

Original--dimmer core

m31-final.thumb.jpg.16a7d67be6e4f3231aec3e8c7e0516c4.jpg

  • Like 24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MarkAR said:

Superb image, definitely got some dark swirls around the core I've not seen before.

Thanks Mark--yes, they are extremely difficult to capture through the brightness of the core without resorting to some form of HDR integration, or what I have done....maybe its cheating?

Edited by Rodd
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh heh, the core of M31 is a barrel of laughs for the imager!  I think that, in the end, all who try end up in about the same position. Welcome to the club! Further penetration is going to need either new cameras or a radically different approach in processing - or both. What you have is good.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ollypenrice said:

Heh heh, the core of M31 is a barrel of laughs for the imager!  I think that, in the end, all who try end up in about the same position. Welcome to the club! Further penetration is going to need either new cameras or a radically different approach in processing - or both. What you have is good.

Olly

Thanks Olly.  It means a lot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said on Astrobin, I think you have teased out more details in there than I have seen before. HDR is not cheating - taming the dynamic range is the key to all processing. A linear version of M31 would be very uninteresting (or maybe interesting to see but rather ugly). Overall it is a great rendation of M31 Rodd!

Edited by gorann
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gorann said:

 HDR is not cheating - taming the dynamic range is the key to all processing. A linear version of M31 would be very uninteresting (or maybe interesting to see but rather ugly). Overall it is a great rendation of M31 Rodd!

Not only is it not cheating, it's the whole point of this game in my view! The art of image processing can be summed up as the management of the data's brightness range.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<wonders> Do classical imagers ever use the (post-processing) "contrasting mask" trick
--- or indeed "contast blending" of multiple exposures? A google search will reveal GIMP
methods for those. E.G. http://tir.astro.utoledo.edu/jdsmith/code/exposure_blend.php

Intrigued re. the "HDR techniques". (If ^^^ is "nonsense" excuse me... As you were! etc.) 🥳

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, gorann said:

As I said on Astrobin, I think you have teased out more details in there than I have seen before. HDR is not cheating - taming the dynamic range is the key to all processing. A linear version of M31 would be very uninteresting (or maybe interesting to see but rather ugly). Overall it is a great rendation of M31 Rodd!

 

3 hours ago, ollypenrice said:

Not only is it not cheating, it's the whole point of this game in my view! The art of image processing can be summed up as the management of the data's brightness range.

Olly

I did not mean HDR was cheating...I was kidding about my manual method being cheating (using different images for different parts of the image).  Believe it or not, but the grand old folks at Pixinsight would call that "painting".  They don't even think replacing targets in a wide field image with data collected at longer focal length is kosher....."painting".  I am sure they would think that I was morally bankrupt!

But I do have a question...why is there no color in the data I added as a luminance?  I added it the same way I always add luminance data--and color is never absent.    Maybe becuase the structures in question were not there at all in my color image?  

Edited by Rodd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rodd said:

 

I did not mean HDR was cheating...I was kidding about my manual method being cheating (using different images for different parts of the image).  Believe it or not, but the grand old folks at Pixinsight would call that "painting".  They don't even think replacing targets in a wide field image with data collected at longer focal length is kosher....."painting".  I am sure they would think that I was morally bankrupt!

But I do have a question...why is there no color in the data I added as a luminance?  I added it the same way I always add luminance data--and color is never absent.    Maybe becuase the structures in question were not there at all in my color image?  

Yes, if there is no colour signal in the structures they will be B/W when you just add lum. You could try to stretch the RGB data to sea if you can find any structures before adding the lum (which was only from the green channel if I got you right).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, gorann said:

Yes, if there is no colour signal in the structures they will be B/W when you just add lum. You could try to stretch the RGB data to sea if you can find any structures before adding the lum (which was only from the green channel if I got you right).

Makes sense.....all the hornets are sleeping peacefully though, not sure I want to kick the nest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rodd said:

Makes sense.....all the hornets are sleeping peacefully though, not sure I want to kick the nest.

I don't think you need to. They are pretty amazing images as they are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mognet said:

I don't think you need to. They are pretty amazing images as they are

Thank you.  That’s the trouble with electronic data.......you can always tinker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Paul M said:

That's a great piece of work!

There is a lot to take in. Need an atlas of M31 to take the full tour (which I'm googling right now)!

Thanks Paul.  A big mosaic with a long focal length and full frame sensor is what is needed for that.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't resist "a go" myself! I used part of an 8192 x 8192 TIFF from NAO:
https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0424.html
I sense this is OK? Anyway, I'm reluctant to ruin play with SGLer's images! 😁

Sometimes *presentation* of data can emphasis a specific point! (or not?)

Wait for it... wait for it... 🥳

aaa.gif.d85dc9be481c99c1c268103810fe450f.gif
 

Edited by Macavity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Macavity said:

I'm reluctant to ruin play with SGLer's images!

Fear not, I can ruin them all by myself!  Its called working them into the ground.  Anyway, the inverted image does reveal things that are easily missed in the regular image.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.