Somerled7 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 Hi all, First post on Stargazers Lounge, though I've been looking at this site for quite a while. I made an aborted attempt at astro-photography a couple of years ago, got a certain distance with it, but then gave up. Under lock-down, all the clear nights recently have tempted me to have another go. A couple of attempts in, and here's the first decent picture I've managed - The North American Nebula which is just starting to rise in the West. This is taken with a Sigma 150-600mm zoom lens at 190mm mounted on an HEQ5 mount, and using a Skywatcher finder scope with a QHY5LII colour camera mounted on a side-bar for guiding. The standard Sigma lens foot is far too flexible for astro work, so I've clamped up the lens barrel with another lens collar to mount it to rigidly to the dovetail bar. At just 190mm, this arrangement seems rigid enough for tracking., and I managed 20*300s exposures before giving up at 3am. Any comments/feedback or suggestions for improvement welcome. 21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skipper Billy Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 Well done - neat solution and 10/10 for perseverance! Lovely image and I hope you are encouraged to keep at it despite the lack of darkness - another 6 weeks and the nights will be drawing in again! 😉 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 I agree, that's very good indeed. Sharp focus, good tracking, sympathetic processing. Processing advice can be very software-specific so what are you using? Olly 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of Clear Skies Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 Looking good, the pillar structure in the head of the Pelican is starting to show so you're capturing some true detail on your target. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somerled7 Posted May 13, 2020 Author Share Posted May 13, 2020 Thanks Olly, I used Deep Sky Stacker with everything on default settings, then processed in Photoshop. I'm quite familiar with Photoshop as I do a fair bit of photography, but using it for astro images is something new for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xsubmariner Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 Love the can do attitude and ingenuity. Nice image, now watch your wallet closely otherwise the AP bug will take all your money. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barkis Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 No looking back now then, that is the Image of a veteran AP. If it passed muster with Olly, then you're now in the premiere league 😀. Well done on your come back.👍. Ron. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 5 hours ago, Somerled7 said: Thanks Olly, I used Deep Sky Stacker with everything on default settings, then processed in Photoshop. I'm quite familiar with Photoshop as I do a fair bit of photography, but using it for astro images is something new for me. OK so a really simple tweak in Ps would be to go to Image-Adjustments-Selective Colour and it will open by default in the reds. Try moving the top slider to the left to lower the cyans in the reds. This usually makes Ha signal pop, but no promises! Olly 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickwayne Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 NOICE. So nice I'll forgive you for not having gone uphill both ways in the snow for several years with nothing but poo images to show for it, like some of us 🙂 If you'd care for a somewhat less simple tweak...see if you can obtain a standalone version of starnet++ and get that running. It's a neural-net processor that yanks the stars from your image so that you can process that gorgeous nebulosity independently. Then, when that's looking quite spectacular, you can blend the stars back in. The idea is that when you stretch an image to map the dim tones onto most of the available tonal range, you inevitably lose saturation in the higher end. So by taking the stars away from that stretching process, you preserve their color, and also avoid enlarging them unduly. No criticism implied of your fine image, but you'll note that there's very little color in the stars. I bet you have plenty in the original data. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somerled7 Posted May 14, 2020 Author Share Posted May 14, 2020 17 hours ago, rickwayne said: NOICE. So nice I'll forgive you for not having gone uphill both ways in the snow for several years with nothing but poo images to show for it, like some of us 🙂 If you'd care for a somewhat less simple tweak...see if you can obtain a standalone version of starnet++ and get that running. It's a neural-net processor that yanks the stars from your image so that you can process that gorgeous nebulosity independently. Then, when that's looking quite spectacular, you can blend the stars back in. The idea is that when you stretch an image to map the dim tones onto most of the available tonal range, you inevitably lose saturation in the higher end. So by taking the stars away from that stretching process, you preserve their color, and also avoid enlarging them unduly. No criticism implied of your fine image, but you'll note that there's very little color in the stars. I bet you have plenty in the original data. Thanks Rick, I'll look into it. In stretching out the image, I did try masking off the stars in Photoshop at various stages, but maybe not enough to preserve the colour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somerled7 Posted May 14, 2020 Author Share Posted May 14, 2020 Thanks Olly, I tried that adjustment and it enhances the reds a bit, so one to remember. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroInvestigator Posted May 15, 2020 Share Posted May 15, 2020 Absolutely amazing! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezphil Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Great picture. Please can you tell me what lens collar you used for your Sigma lens? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobST Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Fantastic Picture 😁 and brilliant idea, i plan to get a heq5 first and use my camera and lenses i already own to do some beginning astro, this post has given me much encouragement 😁 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somerled7 Posted June 13, 2020 Author Share Posted June 13, 2020 1 hour ago, Jezphil said: Great picture. Please can you tell me what lens collar you used for your Sigma lens? It's the Canon B(W) mount ring, but needs to be a third party version that hinges open - I think the proper Canon version doesn't have a hinge, so wouldn't work. It's slightly large, so needs a bit of padding to clamp the lens barrel tightly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezphil Posted June 14, 2020 Share Posted June 14, 2020 Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezphil Posted June 14, 2020 Share Posted June 14, 2020 (edited) What's the screw you are using there to fix the canon mount in place please? Edited June 14, 2020 by Jezphil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now