Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

M42 - The Orion Nebula


fireballxl5

Recommended Posts

The Great Orion Nebula using some poor data I captured on 29th Dec 2019 (hazy cloud, neighbours trees...) with some better quality subs from a couple of weeks later on 17th Jan. Conditions were much improved on the second night and I got 11x300s luminance subs to bring out some fainter details. I used the cracking HDRComposition process in PI with luminance stacks of 10s, 30s, 60s, 120s and 300s to protect the bright core around the Trapezium star cluster - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trapezium_Cluster 

So this image comprises approx. 102 minutes of Lum with 16x60s each of RGB using my dual rig refractors at 1.7arc-sec/pixel.

CS, Andy

M42 Orion Nebula Dec 2019.jpg

  • Like 22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gina said:

Cracking image!  :thumbsup:

Thanks @Gina😀

2 hours ago, dannybgoode said:

Very nice - I do like that.  M42 is one of those targets - there are so many renditions of it and each one is just a bit different from the other depending on the tastes and skills of the imager.

Thanks @dannybgoode I processed this to try and emphasise the reds and blues, whilst trying to avoid worsening the halos I had around the brighter stars in the blue channel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great looking image, plenty of detail and great colors... the only critique I have is that perhaps the black levels are clipped at bit although it could be the monitor with which I'm looking at it. I find that the darkest black level 14-18 in photoshop looks ideal.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MarsG76 said:

Great looking image, plenty of detail and great colors... the only critique I have is that perhaps the black levels are clipped at bit although it could be the monitor with which I'm looking at it. I find that the darkest black level 14-18 in photoshop looks ideal.

 

Thanks @MarsG76🙂 It could be the JPG (or your monitor?) In the TIFF, background levels fluctuate around 18-25 so this seems fine to myself.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

awesome detail and very well done! i took an image of m42 through NASA's Micro observatory with exposure time 60 seconds with 3 filters (RED green and blue) which I combined into one full color  RGB img through the JS9-4L  astro image processing software https://waps.cfa.harvard.edu/eduportal/js9/software.php which is available on the website. The website allows you to request images acccording to your chosen settings and they e-mail you the images in a day or two in .FITS format. You then process them thru the software and create your final image. 

                                                                             389262239_OrionNebulaRGBcombined.jpeg.78a513ee8478be56cf1e2c783c07a8b5.jpeg

Micro observatory website - https://mo-www.cfa.harvard.edu/OWN/astrophoto/microobservatorychallenge.html#standoutentries

May the force be with you😀🔭

Edited by Anakin Skywalker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots to like in the image. The HDR technique has preserved some perfectly discernible detail in the Trapezium but has allowed the colour to burn out to white. I don't know how to prevent that from happening in PI because I do my HDR blending in Photoshop. It must be possible, though.

Olly

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Anakin Skywalker said:

awesome detail and very well done!

and also with you😀

40 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

Lots to like in the image.

Thanks Olly😀 I should stop there but a quick search for good detailed images on the web seems to indicate that these are mainly O or B-type stars and appear white on most that I've looked at closely.  I think here with mine, 60s RGB subs and the relatively low altitude of the target at 53deg N does not help. In fact, a quick play with the RGB stacks confirms that they are not blown but they are poor resolution, with the stars not well resolved and they appear as an off-white mass. It will indicate how poor the conditions generally were throughout this acquisition. See for yourself... 

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, fireballxl5 said:

and also with you😀

Thanks Olly😀 I should stop there but a quick search for good detailed images on the web seems to indicate that these are mainly O or B-type stars and appear white on most that I've looked at closely.  I think here with mine, 60s RGB subs and the relatively low altitude of the target at 53deg N does not help. In fact, a quick play with the RGB stacks confirms that they are not blown but they are poor resolution, with the stars not well resolved and they appear as an off-white mass. It will indicate how poor the conditions generally were throughout this acquisition. See for yourself... 

image.png

It wasn't the star colour but the nebulosity colour which I felt had not been retained. When I blend short and long exposures on this target in Ps I have to increase, quite consderably, the colour saturation of the short subs which contain the nebula colour.

Olly

Edited by ollypenrice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, clearly I thought that you were referring to the star colours 😊 

In PI I used the HDRcomposition process on just the Lum stacks, followed by using the output of this with the RGB image to create the LRGB. I could try bumping the colour saturation of the RGB before adding the Lum.

Thanks for the tip 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I took this image in a different camera (Nikon D3500) setting with exposure time 13 seconds with ISO 25600. I attached the camera to my Celestron Nexstar 6SE SCT and i used tracking. It came out really great and i was really happy that i managed to capture some greeat detail since i'm just startin to figure out the camera setting through a LOT of trial and error!😆. I processed the image through Registax 6 to further enhance detail. I think it came out good. It really helped that the air polution is really low and we have really clear skies here in Tasmania.

 

528950293_M42Processed.thumb.jpg.8f5a25905bf13c8794e4c785ccff438e.jpg

Telescope - Celestron Nexstar 6SE SCT           

 Camera - Nikon D3500 

Exposure time - 13 secs

ISO - 25600

Date - 22/03/20

Time - 20:32

May the force be with you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.