Thalestris24 Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, RolandKol said: Hmmm is this the one you got? https://www.altairastro.com/altair-planostar-0.8x-flattener-reducer-for-starwave-80ed-doublet-refractor-only.html very strange description... "Spacing from rear flat shoulder of the PlanoStar to the CCD film plane is approximately 51-56mm and one can use the Altair Astro M48 variable spacer system to fine-tune the optimum distance for their particular chip and filter setup." It's this one, I believe: https://www.altairastro.com/lightwave-0.8x-reducer.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 3, 2019 Author Share Posted April 3, 2019 8 minutes ago, RolandKol said: Hmmm is this the one you've got? https://www.altairastro.com/altair-planostar-0.8x-flattener-reducer-for-starwave-80ed-doublet-refractor-only.html very strange description... "Spacing from rear flat shoulder of the PlanoStar to the CCD film plane is approximately 51-56mm and one can use the Altair Astro M48 variable spacer system to fine-tune the optimum distance for their particular chip and filter setup." No, I've got this one https://www.altairastro.com/lightwave-0.8x-reducer.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RolandKol Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, Thalestris24 said: It's this one, I believe: https://www.altairastro.com/lightwave-0.8x-reducer.html In this case... With a low profile T-Ring and Canon Backfocus, - he needs to add around 1-2 mm spacer!!!! My standard T-Ring is almost 11mm (10.9) and worked fine with Canon and SW CC (backfocus the same - 55mm) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 3, 2019 Author Share Posted April 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, RolandKol said: In this case... With a low profile T-Ring and Canon Backfocus, - he needs to add around 1-2 mm spacer!!!! My standard T-Ring is almost 11mm (10.9) and worked fine with Canon and SW CC (backfocus the same - 55mm) Canon back focus is 44mm + t ring = 55mm . The low profile t ring is is about 1.5mm thick so much to short The Altair site states a standard t ring is needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RolandKol Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RolandKol Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 3 hours ago, Anthonyexmouth said: I've got a low profile t ring. Just looks like it's gonna be expensive getting enough spacers in various thicknesses to try and adjust it. Damn these pricy hobbies. Was referring to this post of yours and the picture you posted. Just measure your current T-ring... You will probably need just 1mm to add Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 3, 2019 Author Share Posted April 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, RolandKol said: Was referring to this post of yours and the picture you posted. Just measure your current T-ring... You will probably need just 1mm to add I just meant I've got one. It's not in use at the moment. The standard t ring gives me the correct "on paper" spacing. The low profile one would be @8-9mm too short Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RolandKol Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 Misunderstood... Sadness... I would expect it work out of the box... Maybe with a slight distortion, but not like this... If not too late... l would send ff back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 3, 2019 Author Share Posted April 3, 2019 Just now, RolandKol said: Misunderstood... Sadness... I would expect it work out of the box... Maybe with a slight distortion, but not like this... If not too late... l would send ff back... I've been taking to Altair via email. Been told they've never had any issues and told to get the tilt issue sorted. Hence this thread. Very disappointed actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carastro Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 Did AA see a one of your images, surely they can't possibly make that statement on seeing the evidence. Carole Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 29 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said: Canon back focus is 44mm + t ring = 55mm . The low profile t ring is is about 1.5mm thick so much to short The Altair site states a standard t ring is needed I was asking before how thick and what make your standard t-ring is i.e. the one in your photo? I might be wrong but it doesn't look like any of the standard t-rings I have. Louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 3, 2019 Author Share Posted April 3, 2019 Just now, Thalestris24 said: I was asking before how thick and what make your standard t-ring is i.e. the one in your photo? I might be wrong but it doesn't look like any of the standard t-rings I have. Louise Not sure off the top of my head. It's all wrapped up under the cover at the moment. I did wonder about that and got a baader T ring coming from Amazon to compare, can always send it back if it's the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 3, 2019 Author Share Posted April 3, 2019 17 minutes ago, carastro said: Did AA see a one of your images, surely they can't possibly make that statement on seeing the evidence. Carole Yeah, sent them the sub that I posted in this thread and the pic of the image train Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said: Not sure off the top of my head. It's all wrapped up under the cover at the moment. I did wonder about that and got a baader T ring coming from Amazon to compare, can always send it back if it's the same. It's really worth getting a digital caliper - I have one of these https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B007K7F04C/ref=oh_aui_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 7 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said: Yeah, sent them the sub that I posted in this thread and the pic of the image train I'm confused - your photo shows a standard eos t ring but the example sub was taken with a low profile t ring? Louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 3, 2019 Author Share Posted April 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, Thalestris24 said: I'm confused - your photo shows a standard eos t ring but the example sub was taken with a low profile t ring? Louise No, the sub in this thread was with the image train pic in this thread. Standard t ring not a low profile one. 60sec sub ISO 1600 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Anthonyexmouth said: No, the sub in this thread was with the image train pic in this thread. Standard t ring not a low profile one. 60sec sub ISO 1600 Oh ok. I don't understand why it's so far out... I'd definitely check/measure the distance between the sensor mark line and the flattener flange/join line preferably with a digital caliper, else with a mm rule. Louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 3, 2019 Author Share Posted April 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Thalestris24 said: Oh ok. I don't understand why it's so far out... I'd definitely check/measure the distance between the sensor mark line and the flattener flange/join line preferably with a digital caliper, else with a mm rule. Louise To measure I set it up on a flat surface with a couple of Tri squares and a steel rule. Measured 55mm so should be close. Be interesting to see the baader t ring when it arrives and compare the 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalestris24 Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 ps maybe pm this member who didn't seem to have any problems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 5, 2019 Author Share Posted April 5, 2019 Well my new baader t ring arrived today. Quite surprised it's actually thicker than my off brand one so pushing the distance even further. Interesting to see what happens. Baader on the right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RolandKol Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Now, lets wait 3 weeks for clear skies to test! (*Rol knocks on the wood) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RolandKol Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 P.S. Looking just at the pic, without measurements... it will be close.. but I have the feeling, it does not push to 1mm which you probably need as minimum. Waiting for test! I hope I am wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 5, 2019 Author Share Posted April 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, RolandKol said: Now, lets wait 3 weeks for clear skies to test! (*Rol knocks on the wood) I like your optimism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthonyexmouth Posted April 5, 2019 Author Share Posted April 5, 2019 1 minute ago, RolandKol said: P.S. Looking just at the pic, without measurements... it will be close.. but I have the feeling, it does not push to 1mm which you probably need as minimum. Waiting for test! I hope I am wrong According to the distortion it's going to push it the wrong way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RolandKol Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Just now, Anthonyexmouth said: I like your optimism. It is always happens to me... actually... I strongly think of artificial star... but simply have no space to place it far.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.