Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_christmas_presents.thumb.jpg.587637e0d01baf4b6d21b73610610bbb.jpg

Recommended Posts

I am considering buying a Skywatcher al/az+eq mount to use in alt az mode for lunar CCD photography. I currently have a celestron 11 CDC and a celestron 8 on a nexstar evo mount. I can use both these telescopes with the celestron 'solar system align' and sharp cap for short (~10 sec 300-500 frame) captures. I want to replace the nexstar evo mount for the C8 with a sturdier Skywatcher AZ-EQ 5GT mount BUT -

1) the altz/az option is supposed to be 'for visual use'. Does this mean its tracking in lunar rate/alt-az mode is very poor ?

2) I am confused about 'alignment' (is this only necessary to accurately access the database of interesting object positions?) The skywatcher mount does not have solar system align - but it does have lunar rate tracking in alt-az mode.  If I align on any random stars in lunar rate+alt-az mode with the moon centred in the telscope will the mount then track the moon? If not ,is there another way to track the moon ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The AZ-EQ5 GT has very good tracking in Alt-Az and is fine for short exposures of planets and the moon however EQ mode will always be better for imaging as you can do long exposures which is why they recommend Alt-Az for visual. 

The Skywatcher does now have it’s version of solar system align but you have to select daytime alignment to use it.

From manual:  Now the screen will prompt the brightest object in the sky. If in daytime, the Sun will be the first target prompted in the alignment star list. You may also use the scroll keys to browse to another alignment object, such as the Moon, a planet, or a bright star to use as a refer- ence target

And yes you will need to select lunar tracking for the moon.

Couple of images taken using an AZ-EQ5 in Az mode.

D5AC8BE9-6B5A-45E5-8C87-41298151D9B3.jpeg

DC58FCFD-42CA-4911-9ACC-94B3C7AB05E0.jpeg

FEA40860-496E-4BAE-8831-5082A3D0C78D.jpeg

Edited by johninderby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for the information. I can't use equatorial mounts because I can only observe out of a flat window and theres no room. I can't do deep sky because I am in a light polluted town and I also have AMD eye problems - no central vision. I can only use a CCD image on a computer screen. I used to be a fanatical deep sky observer many years ago (mad on galaxy clusters).

I'm glad to hear that the mount now has a solar system align option - is it standard or do you have to update the supplied software ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure when the solar align feature was added but worth updating the handset firmware anyway as the latest version has some improvements. Think many don’t realise that you can use just the moon or a planet for an alignment as it’s under the daytime alignment option which despite being called daytime can be used at night.

I find it usefull for when I just want a quick look at the moon for instance as no proper alignment needed. 

Edited by johninderby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks again. Is the mount in your photo a standard one ? or is  it on a non-standard tripod - the commercial photos I have seen have a steel tripod. (Do you happen to know its height? As a separate matter, what is the telescope ? A 6 inch Mak ? is the carry handle an extra ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Replaced the standard steel tripod with a Berlebach wooden tripod but it is a standard AZ-EQ5 GT head. Less vibration  and higher load capacity than the stock one as well as better looking. I fitted the optional spread stopper to mine

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/berlebach-tripods/berlebach-uni-18-tripod-heq5-eq6.html

The picture used on the FLO website is actually a photo I took of mine before the spread stopper was fitted.

Scope is a Skymax 180 fitted with tube rings and the carry handle is fitted to the rings.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A final question concerning the mount - how does the head fit onto the tripod ? is there a single bolt ? ps I also use the ZWO 290mm - with an IR pass filter - nice camera !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s a standard EQ5 / HEQ5 fitting with an M10 bolt so it fits any standard EQ5 / HEQ5 tripod. 

The old semi pillar tripod that used to come with the AZ-EQ5 GT Mount is no longer available, at least in the UK as far as I’m aware.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎12‎/‎10‎/‎2018 at 12:51, umbilic said:

If I align on any random stars in lunar rate+alt-az mode with the moon centred in the telscope will the mount then track the moon? If not ,is there another way to track the moon ?

With my Starwatcher Synscan systems, I normally do a "Brightest Star" 2-star alignment, and, once aligned, the mount tracks at sidereal rate. If I then go to the "Planet" menu, and step to, and select, "Moon", the mount automatically selects lunar tracking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

contrary to my last  post - more questions. I purchased the mount from FLO yesterday and am looking forwards to using it. Prior to its arrival I have been reading on-line manuals and am concerned that the Skyscan manual I have located (AZ goto telescope instruction manual) does not mention 'daylight observation' under which you say that lunar alignment is mentioned. Is the manual out of date or can I expect the feature to be present in my new Skyscan hanset ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just purchased a Skywatcher AZ/EQ 5 GT mount to carry a C8 SCT OTA or a Skywatcher 127mm Mak to use in alt/az mode for lunar work. Can anyone suggest a method of setting up the mount for lunar tracking in alt/az mode without star alignment ? The handset instruction manual I just downloaded makes no mention of alignment possibilities other than 1 or 2 star methods. I have been using celestron kit with a solar system align option where you simply enter observatory position, time and date etc with lunar rate tracking, centre the moon in the eyepiece, press align and off you go ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just go to this section of the manual

3.6 Alt-Azimuth Mounts using Daytime Alignment Method

You can select the daytime method from the alignment menu on the hand control. Note that you will have to select the Alt-Az setting to use the daytime method. 

B34C36CB-A0AA-43CD-83F9-C0EFCEC3FFA0.jpeg

Edited by johninderby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks once again - I had downloaded an out of date synscan manual - now have version 4 WITH daytime align - no more confusion !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By DeepSkyMan
      Hi there, our Astro group were booked into our normal dark skies venue for an observing weekend in February.  Unfortunately, the accommodations are now going to be undergoing renovation and will be closed for the first 3 months of the year.   We are looking at a couple of alternative venues.  These are field study centres, one at Blancathra near Keswick and the other Malham Tarn in the Yorkshire Dales national park.  Wondering if anybody has  any observing experience of the skies in these areas.
      Kind Regards
      Paul.
    • By Ralphf
      Hi. Was up at dawn observing Mercury rising in the southeast and slowly swept my binoculars left. I was able to vaguely see a small triangle formed by Upsilon Ophiuchi, HR  6128 and HR 6137. That was the limit of view as sunlight was washing out anything else to the left of that. But I clicked on the adjacent HR6144 star in my Sky Guide app and it lists as being 6,900 light years away. When I checked the Ski Safari app, the same star is listed as 1,900 light years. I went online and found little info but, “In the Sky” web page it’s HR 6144 at 9 kilo years / 9,000 light years. Does anyone have any info as to why the huge discrepancies?
      https://in-the-sky.org/data/object.php?id=TYC5627-1490-1
      Thanks in advance for your help. 
    • By Sun
      POLAR ALIGNMENT IF THE POLE STAR IS OBSTRUCTED (e.g. OBSERVING ON A S-FACING BALCONY!!!) Set up your scope on the floor (assuming it's reasonably level) in equatorial mode, with a rough guess at North. Put the tube into whatever 'home' position the instructions specify, or that you have chosen. Now choose an easily recognisable bright star at mid altitude. Pretend you HAVE polar aligned, and tell the scope to go to this star. When the slewing stops lift the scope very gently and turn the mount round till the star is in the centre of the field of view and you should have a fairly good polar alignment. If you are for example videoing planets and can also autoguide, this alignment may be all you need. But you can now refine it by the drift method if you need to - see https://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-resources/accurate-polar-alignment/ This method should be quite useful for Southern hemisphere observing, where the 'south pole star' - Sigma Octantis - is difficult to find especially in light polluted skies. And of course my advice here applies if you have a North-facing balcony!
       
    • By Sunshine
      HEY its about time eh!!!! my first astrophoto with a dedicated cam using all the bells and whistles like iCap and Registax.
       Programs that are still alien mumbo jumbo to me, but after eating a whole bunch of youtube videos and a bunch more trial and error, I finally pumped out this abomination, or so it must seem to you Pro's lol
      I had a very vague idea of how to set up proper parameters in iCap for lunar imaging but I tried several settings and used youtube also, regarding wavelets, I basically dragged sliders all over the place
      and watched changes occur. There is much to learn about post work in iCap, but i'll give it the old college try lol, my sole reason for posting is for feedback, this is where you Pro's shine, oh do I need 
      feedback. 
      Anyway, it is my first astrophoto so no matter how much better it can be, well, it will do for now and I say that with a bit of swag because hey! at least I see craters there lol.
      Exposure time.....no clue!
      Number of frames....a whole bunch
      Attempts.....way too many!
      Wavelet values.....all over the place
      De noising....didn't work at all I think
      Codec...Y800
      Resolution...12 something by ??? forgot
      The conditions were horrid, a mak is not an imaging scope as I have learned the hard way, F1800 not good, I will definitely be looking at a much shorter FL scope,
      Far too tight an image, I would need a 50 shot mosaic for full moon, or a focal reducer which I'm not sure anyone makes for my Mak.

    • By Sunshine
      Amazing facts and detail in this 4K tour of the lunar surface!
       
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.