Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Skinny Venus Titchy Mars 8/3/17


mikeDnight

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, John said:

Nicely done Mike :smiley:

What do you mean when you say integrated light against the Venus sketch ?

Hi John,

No filters were used, just a white light view. The SPA planetary section under Ian Phelps used that term, though I always felt it a bit pointless myself. Sometimes I use it other times I don't. Really, unless filters are specifically stated I'd assume the observer hadn't used them. 

I rarely ever use filters on the planet's as I feel they hardly ever enhance anything. I usually see the detail better without them!

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mikeDnight said:

Hi John,

No filters were used, just a white light view. The SPA planetary section under Ian Phelps used that term, though I always felt it a bit pointless myself. Sometimes I use it other times I don't. Really, unless filters are specifically stated I'd assume the observer hadn't used them. 

I rarely ever use filters on the planet's as I feel they hardly ever enhance anything. I usually see the detail better without them!

Mike

Thanks Mike.

I've tried different types of filters on the planets over the years and not really found any gains either. Even Tele Vue's quite pricey Bandmate Planetary filter didn't seem to do much other than to add a bubble gum pink tint to the image. Not my cup of tea !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I managed to catch Venus this evening just before it sank behind the trees on our W boundary. Very slim crescent now - 8.9% illuminated I believe. Thats the skinniest that I can recall seeing it I think.

My wife thought she was looking at the moon when I showed her the view through the eyepiece at 69x :rolleyes2:

I pointed out that the moon was rising up behind her and was 90% plus illuminated right now.......

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John said:

I managed to catch Venus this evening just before it sank behind the trees on our W boundary. Very slim crescent now - 8.9% illuminated I believe. Thats the skinniest that I can recall seeing it I think.

My wife thought she was looking at the moon when I showed her the view through the eyepiece at 69x :rolleyes2:

I pointed out that the moon was rising up behind her and was 90% plus illuminated right now.......

 

I can see how your wife thought she was looking at the moon, as Venus is so large at the moment.

In 2009, when I was competing with paulastro to follow Venus to its thinnest, I remember observing it on a few occasions during the day. I made sure that the Sun was hidden behind my house, so i couldn't accidentally sweep it into the field of view, then carefully swept the region of sky it was in until I found it. If you've nothing better to do with your time, its worth the effort. ?

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.