Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

BUSY BEES (M44)


halli

Recommended Posts

Hi All

Thought I would make life a bit easier by choosing a nice cluster to gain more experience of using a CCD, instead of trying to dig a faint galaxy out of the light polluted mirk !!

I choose M44 because of the nice star colours and its simplicity in order to practice LRGB processing which I am new to and found the Light Vortex tutorials very useful.

I have had a few little issues ensuring my 383l had enough voltage to avoid a very noisy output and bought a 13.8v regulated supply which appears to have done the trick.

130pds and Atik 383l without CC  - but now I have bought one ! -  but need to get the spacers so I can use it - perhaps next time !!!

Best Wishes 

Ian

 

56a7d87ebcda5_M44_130pds_383l_dss_lrgb_p

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of thoughts on this image - There seems to be a light circle in the middle of the frame - Did you use flats? If not these are an easy enough way to really improve an image over all. Also to me it looks as though the black point has been clipped a little and the background is too black...... Has the histogram gone too far to the left?

Great star colour and a pleasing one to look at :) Hope that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your kind comments.

Yes you are correct about the two points you made wrt flats and the black point Sara !   I am still trying to get a repeatable flat generation process with the 383l, so I decided to try and get away with it for this image !    

I think ive got a useable workflow now using the  SGP flats calibration wizard to get the right ADU (25K seems ok) with a LED panel.  Ony thing is that this requires the telescope to be brought indoors  to perform and the risk is that any dust etc will move as a result !  I found a recent image had a number of dust bunnies on it and when I introduced the flats the dust bunnies increased except they were light instead of dark !  They certainly help quite a lot with vignetting and gradients though.  I have now removed the dust from its souce which was the outer glass window on the CCD !.   I shall also try and see if I can get consistent results with the telescope in situ.  I agree they are quite important to improve the quality of images.

I am finding using the 383l even with 2" filters still produces some vignetting in the corners which surprises me - not sure why this is but this is easily removed using DBE in Pixinsight or better still with flats.

With respect to the black point I must admit I  succumbed to the temptation to take it into the histogram a bit to cover up a multiple of sins in the backgound !  With this sort of cluster I dont think I lost  too much  important data as I was just interested in reproducing the star colours nicely and they were bright anyway.  Call it artistic license I guess ! Still feels like cheating though !!!  Although I guess any faint galaxies in the vicinity as Michael has suggested would have been affected

Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.