Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

a nested double double?


Recommended Posts

On Sunday night I found zeta CrB and STF 1964 for the first time. This is a really nice pair of easy doubles, zeta brighter and closer, 1964 wider, dimmer and set at a jaunty angle. The two can be seen and split in the same field with a judicious choice of eyepiece, which is my criterion for a double double (a fairly relaxed one - I'm not too bothered whether doubles are physically related or not).

However, it gets better. Cranking up the magnification I was able to split STF 1964 CD, given in WDS as 1.5", mags 8.1 and 9.0. I didn't hold out much hope of splitting AB (1.2", 8.1/9.9) and indeed I couldn't even elongate it. Still this must be unique as a double double within a double double. 

I would love to hear if anyone out there has split STF 1964 AB and therefore seen 1964 as a d-d. A challenge to those with bigger apertures, darker skies and better-honed double-splitting eyes! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After I posted this it occurred to me that the Star-Splitters might have something to say about it - and indeed they do:

http://bestdoubles.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/star-hopping-in-the-northern-marches-of-corona-borealis-part-two-kappa-%CE%BA-and-%CF%83-1983-zeta-%CE%B6-and-%CF%83-1964-and-lambda-%CE%BB/#attachment_5772

Although John N doesn't claim the AB prize, a bit of googling shows it can be done, at least by the redoubtable Wilfried from CN:

http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/6062262/Main/5348277

Steady seeing to you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A nice group this - I had a look this evening. As you say, another double-double!

First impressions of STF 1964 AB was that it was an out of focus star. However, as the scope cooled and the seeing improved a bit, it resolved itself nicely into a close pair. IMO it is not that difficult, although clearly very seeing dependent. 5" Mak at x200 and x250.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.