Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

The Sun - 19 Feb 2014


David Smith

Recommended Posts

Had some time today and quite a decent sized gap in the clouds again so shot the usual round of 130ish but then had a play with some filters to see what the effect was. I tried a #56 Green "planetary" filter which I use all the time to bring out detail visually, a UHC and an OIII filter. All of these reduce quite significantly the amount of light hitting the 1100D's sensor and consequently I had to adjust the exposure. Details (and imges) below, suffice to say I am not convinced on the effectiveness of the OIII and UHC filters but the jury is still out on the green - opinions welcomed! All of these images were processed in exactly the same way (converted to TIFF, stretched and cropped in PIPP, Stacked in R5.1 and finished in Gimp2.6 - again identical steps for each stack) so as to provide a clean comparison.

First up the routine white light shot as normal with the Baader white light film, 135 x 1/1600th@ISO 100. 34 frames stacked.

12637316843_32ea51e7b3_o.jpg
201402019 by David_The_Bears_Fan, on Flickr

Second the #56 Green filtered image, 135 x 1/1250th@ISO 400, 57 frames stacked.

12637179255_bd1d1c1194_o.jpg
201402019Green by David_The_Bears_Fan, on Flickr

Third the OIII filtered image, 131 x 1/500th@ISO 400, 58 frames stacked.

12637320983_876108b27e_o.jpg
201402019OIII by David_The_Bears_Fan, on Flickr

Lastly the UHC filtered image, 131 x 1/1250th@ISO 200, 76 frames stacked.

12637658534_c470a4a3bb_o.jpg
201402019UHC by David_The_Bears_Fan, on Flickr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to see the blue stretched down your way ... :laugh: 

Prefer the OIII personally but I may be a little biased ...  :grin:

To be honest I couldn't get a decent image with the 1100D whichever combination I used , including the wedge , so I dumped it for another 1000D ...  :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice shots as usual :smiley: I'm gonna vote green, I think I can see a bit more definition, especially on the smaller spots, though it looks a very slight touch noisier to me. I really do think you are in the land of personal preference here! :smiley:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is quite difficult to see the difference on here. The original images show a considerable difference in the detail between the unfiltered / green and the OIII / UHC filtered shots. The #56 green filter seems to bring out the faculae but the increased ISO seems to cause a similar increase in noise. To get the best here I think I would need to switch to ND3.8 to allow me to use the short exposures with the #56 filter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.