Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

1st pic of Jupiter


ardbeg74

Recommended Posts

HI Guys,

Thought I'd share my first attempt at afocal / stacking. Not exactly a masterpiece but gotta start somewhere :)

Camera was Mrs Ardbegs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX07.

The whole experience last night was a bit of a fiddle to say the least, trying to hold the image in the centre of the zoomed in camera while not setting off the EQ3-2 mount into a wobble and adjusting the tracking with the other hand. Lots of footage, mostly wobbles and black space... but there was that 14 seconds where it all came together and registax sorted the rest out.

Will order an afocal mounting bracket this week, im sure if the image was steady i could tease more detail out.... 

Clear Skies,

Mark

post-32804-0-04717300-1385922529.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had some more time to re-stack, play with the wavelets and mess around in gimp.

Not going to get any more detail out but its fun to play around. Much darker now but maybe I like this one better? Though does feel like artistic licence cos the first image was closer to what i actually saw in the EP.

Anyways, clear skies to you all

Mark

post-32804-0-64857700-1385939586.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the last image is too processed; the first a little too soft. My preference would be something in between, nearer the first than the latter, but this is all a personal choice. Look at damian peach's website and see how he processes his

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice one Ardbeg,

that's actually an amazingly good result especially considering it's your first attempt and you would appear to be using a 6" Newt on an EQ3-2 mount. I have a similar set up but have never given a thought to the idea of imaging with it. Perhaps I should reconsider??!!

Stock eyepieces eh? Wow, I am seriously impressed - even more so if you're using a Barlow as well.

Respect!

BTW, I personally much prefer the first photo, it's much closer to the type of pictures of Jupiter we are all used to seeing.

Were any of the moons visible?

Keep up the good work Ardbeg, and a drop of the old Ardbeg Islay wouldn't go amiss either... :tongue: :tongue: :tongue:

Kind regards

Roger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everybody! Feel really encouraged to get back out there and work at it!


James, i'll take a look at what Damian is doing. I agree its a bit over processed, looking more like a marble or humbug rather than jupiter :) Best thing about imaging though ... there is always something to do when its cloudy outside!!!


Roger... yea if you have a digital camera its worth giving it a shot. If i can do it, so can you. Jupiter needs to be pretty high up, say 45 to 50+ alt. and the seeing needs to be reasonable. Just take a lot of footage. I took over an hour of footage just to get 14 seconds of ok footage. Even though the footage I got was no where near as good as what was in the EP, stacking and wavelets really made the difference. Try and get your polar alignment as good as you can as the FOV is going to be tiny AND you will be zoomed in on the camera, so the less tracking controls to adjust the better! Its still going to shake like crazy unless you have surgeons hands, but you only need 10 sec of good footage, so dont give up!!


I also found that I could tilt the camera a little to help track.


Moons, yea IIRC 4 were visible earlier in the evening (or was that friday). I took a break from imaging and watched europa transit for a bit. That was nice. One moon was visible in the original footage but seems to have averaged out during stacking...


Nigele2 - hehe, yea it pixelates quite quickly on zoom, be like lego on your walls :) Just about to order an afocal mounting bracket so hopefully i should get better footage to work with weather permitting...


Clear skies

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.