Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_31.thumb.jpg.b7a41d6a0fa4e315f57ea3e240acf140.jpg

Nigele2

Members
  • Content Count

    187
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

64 Excellent

About Nigele2

  • Rank
    Star Forming

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Diving
  • Location
    Hampshire, UK

Recent Profile Visitors

816 profile views
  1. Sorry for delay in thanking you for great input but families!!!! Anyway a big thanks. I´ve hunted around and I'm having problems finding exact weight and dimensions. Lots of "great for pick up and go" but not many specifics. However seems clear I can get what you recommend within budget. As I have just over 2 months I think I'll hunt EBay to see if I can get something maybe better at a secondhand price. Shouldn't have any problems picking up a ST80 in March if I've had no luck. As for India being in the northern hemisphere having been there for the first time in November
  2. Hi guys and a very happy new year to you all. Well I haven’t managed much star gazing in 2017 but hopeful this year will be better. And planning ahead that is where I could do with some help. In April I will be in northeast India in the Himalayas and we (wife and I) will be staying in some homestays in very remote and high (8000 feet) locations where light pollution is certainly not an issue. And we also will be staying on a nature reserve and are interested in some bigger animal and smaller bird sightings. We have a small pair of bird watching binos. But what else can we tak
  3. Well you guys fuelled something which led to more questions than it answered but that is the universe we know and love. One thing it led to was the concept that the universe is just a zone of space that we perceive and that another universe maybe over there and another one over there. [When I was very young I used to think that we would arrive at the edge of the universe, drill a hole, and climb through ] And maybe a question for a different thread but are we sure life was only created once on either or both earth and mars? i.e. there is more than one common ancestor or there ha
  4. Much thanks as always. You guys never let the side down. However ...... If gravity pulls them together, gravity sourced by Andromeda and the Milky Way, then they almost certainly will merge. Even if they slip by one another presumably they will attract once more and maybe oscillate until they merge. Does that seem logical? As time goes by would we expect lots of galaxies living in near neighbourhoods to merge? Cheers
  5. Hi all. I wonder if anyone can help me with our little dilemma. The universe is expanding by stretching so everything is moving apart. So how come Andromeda is moving towards us (relative to our perspective)? Any thoughts very welcome because we have exhausted our brains on this one. Cheers
  6. Cheers Reddos. Bit baffled by public involvement. I'd rather scientists chose the targets that give us the best science. But maybe they are saying they already have all the photos they need. But great pictures for sure. ps: The suggestion NASA needs to watch out for the Trump impact although merely conjecture here is possibly a more general concern. But Juno is beyond that stage thankfully.
  7. Just been reading this First evidence of life on earth 'found' Found it interesting as if we want to find very basic first stage life 'out there' it seems clear we need to know what we are looking for. And from this article one can see that is not so straightforward. But again more advances are being made across the board and that bodes well for exciting scientific revelations ahead and not in the very distant future. What of course would be really great is if they found forms of life that started and terminated totally independent of our ancestral tree. Now that would reall
  8. Barkis for me us discovering intelligent life is statistically very unlikely even if the universe is teeming with life. On this planet life has been around for about 3.8 billion years and had what may loosely call an intelligent form for just a few centuries if that. And only 10s of years with the ability to transmit and receive signals from afar. And as it seems keen to kill itself off in the next 200 years (which who knows may be a common trait of intelligent life development) then two intelligent life forms overlapping on the time line and near enough together is almost nil. And
  9. I do find this amazing news. OK the planets identified may not have life but their discovery surely increases the potential number of EXOplanets, and earth sized planets in goldilocks zones. Back just 2 months ago I did a poll here asking if it was thought that life would either be created from scratch in a lab or found out in the universe. In those 2 months not only has the potential number of exoplanets increased but news has arrived from Ceres regarding the ingredients for life being naturally found there. Plus other successes regarding technology funding and advancement that will i
  10. Sorry for delay in responding, been away. John interesting. I'd only imagined a simple cell that had the potential to evolve over millions of years. I see no point like yourself in making anything more complex. After all there is plenty of life we can clone, manipulate and evolve already on the planet. But the more important thing for me would be the conclusions we can draw from the creation of very simple life. If life had been created twice on earth (and despite the genius of our scientists they are only trying to replicate the original process as I see it) how would that impact
  11. Heh guys you have revitalised my thread that I thought was history and made me laugh.. Many thanks. Any more want to vote? The way this is going I'm going to have to give the man in the moon a chance. My nan thought he was there and she knew everything
  12. Well it was a bit of festive fun and obviously not statistically sound but many thanks to the 22 (plus me) who took part. From it I thought: 17 thought life was out there (8 thinking we will find it by 2050) vs 4 who thought we are alone. I thought there might be a bit more optimism for 2050 than that indicates but I guess many of you are scientific in thinking and therefore have a good amount of realism as opposed to wishful thinking. And I was a bit surprised by an 8 to 1 who thought lab life might be created by 2050. Thinking about it I should have put in the missing option
  13. James I think man meets my life criteria (above) but maybe you have a point .
  14. Ronin from my viewpoint I'd settle for a very basic form of life but one that had the container, energy conversion, sustainability and duplication ability. And critically, whether based on RNA or whatever,something that also shows an ability to evolve. If a single cell slime had those characteristics that would do me I guess that it is interesting that the laboratory process will most likely be a very basic form of live, there will not be a Frankenstein. While finding life in the cosmos might be at that basic level, we find bacteria that hitched a ride on a cosmos travelling rock/ic
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.