Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

NGC 6888


lensman57

Recommended Posts

Hi To All,

I took this a couple of nights ago, not the best imaging evening but i wanted to give the ATIK workout, any advice is much appreciated as usual and forgive the slight black clipping and the star bloat, I am jsut starting to learn the ropes.

It is a straight stack of 10 subs, 600s each, SW ED80 @F7.5 and ATIK 428 EX osc.

Many Thanks and Regards,

A.G

PS: I posted this by mistake in the "starting with imaging " forum tonight so please excuse the double posting, I am not trying to be everywhere with my images.

post-28808-0-42945200-1373500873_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This looks like a good start, but I think your data has quite a lot more to offer.

What software were you using to stretch the data? A more sympathetic stretch should help control the noise.

Keep it up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This looks like a good start, but I think your data has quite a lot more to offer.

What software were you using to stretch the data? A more sympathetic stretch should help control the noise.

Keep it up!

Hi,

Many thanks for your reply, only used a very conservative stretch in StarTools and a little play in the CS2, at the moment all my captures seem to suffer from noise, I don't think that I used any darks for this one but I am not sure as I am guilty of not keeping records of what I do. Any advice is much appreciated though.

Regards,

A.G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good start but 10 subs is no way near enough for OSC @ f/7.5 :)

If you think 10 x 600 second for MONO each filter ( 30 x 600 ) then OSC needs at least the same and much much more :)

This is the reason why OSC is not 'faster' to get ‘a good result’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good start but 10 subs is no way near enough for OSC @ f/7.5 :)

If you think 10 x 600 second for MONO each filter ( 30 x 600 ) then OSC needs at least the same and much much more :)

This is the reason why OSC is not 'faster' to get ‘a good result’

Hi Guy,

I fully appreciate your point but I am very time limited, I mostly work in the evenings so by the time I subtract the free evenings and add in the "clearish" nights it does not leave a lot of imaging time, I understnd you are up north too and at the moment I have an imaging window of about 3 hours at best from my busy back garden. I also do have Atik 16IC and a set of high transmission RGB filters and I will give that a go , I am also working on adapting a Meade series 4000 f6.3 reducer to the SW 80 but as yet I have had no luck sourcing a suitable adapter, everything seems to be far too long. Many thanks for your advice and kind comments.

Regards,

A.G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Gina,

Many thanks again, I have a long way to go before I come anywhere near the quality of your images but I am trying to learn fast.

Reagrds,

A.G

Thank you :) I've been going a while now and put quite a lot into it - very dogged and persistant :D Yes, there's a lot to learn but the learning and gradually improving is all part of it and something I find very enjpoyable :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.