Fordos Moon Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Browsing tinternet at work and admiring regular folks photos. I've noticed a fair few star spikes. Are these processed/photoshopped or do they appear naturally in some images?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesF Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 1. They're an abomination2. They're usually the result of diffraction caused by the arms of the spider when imaging with a newt or similar scope where the secondary is supported by a spider3. Some deluded individuals spoil their images by using software to add them during processing4. They're an abominationI think that about covers it Seriously though, items 2 and 3 do apply. Some people like them, some people dislike them. I couldn't possibly comment on which group I belong to.James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukebl Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 They're an abomination, apparently! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stem1989 Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 I second the abomination band wagon hideous things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fordos Moon Posted February 18, 2013 Author Share Posted February 18, 2013 Pleasing response. An abomination it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 He heh, I'm really glad James took the risk on this one! I normally namby pamby about by saying that I can put up with them on long focal length images but not on widefields. It's not just the spikes, either, its the little square stars in widefield images. The ones that just fail to make spikes but aren't round either.Once you're into big scopes, though, spikes it is. Abominable but true!Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnrt Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Well, when the only other option is a refractor that costs more than the car you drive around in, you will learn to live with the spikes. I am "at one" with my spiked side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Well, when the only other option is a refractor that costs more than the car you drive around in, you will learn to live with the spikes. I am "at one" with my spiked side.Are you saying it's possible to buy a telescope for less than the price of a car? Tell me more! Tell me more!Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronin Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 James, don't sit on the fence tell us what you really think. :grin: :grin: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of Clear Skies Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 It's not just the spikes, either, its the little square stars in widefield images.Personally, I find the medium sized 'square' stars much less aesthetically pleasing than the brighter ones with well-defined diffraction spikes. I'm fairly sanguine about the whole thing though, it's a fair price to pay for aperture.I wonder if it's possible to reduce the square star problem somehow with some post-processing somehow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.