Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

TAL 100mm F/8 refractor


Recommended Posts

I don't know when Tal started making the short scopes, but from what I was told by the owner, he had bought it several years ago. It does seem like its been modded for some reason.

Surely you can't just hack off 250mm from the tube and still expect it to focus, but apparently it does. The previous owner used it for white light solar observing.

It came with a generic diagonal and an E-lux 25mm plossl (made in Taiwan)

I need to get a first light with it and see how it performs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

You probably could hack some length off the tube and get it to focus if you have a long enough focuser drawtube. Might have some issues with the baffles inside the tube / drawtube being in the wrong positions though.

If it's been used for solar then losing a bit of the effective aperture may not have been a concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes, it seems to have a huge home brew dew shield as well. It fits perfectly but only slides off the end and does not retract. I'll take a daylight pic tomorrow. Might even look at the sun if its shining. :cool:

Anyone got a pic of a Tal logo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say that's a Tal 100RS from the early to mid 2000's.

a/ If it's got the deep purple-ish coating

b/ that's the early Tal RS 2" R&P focuser

Someones having a laugh saying it's F8. They've never ever made an F8. Not even a prototype. I hope they didn't think chopping a bit off the tube length shortens the focal length ?!?!?!? :smiley:

These older R&P scopes had a very long focus drawtube, so it might well still be able to come to focus, even with a big chunk sawn off the original length of the ota. If it doesn't, get a long extension tube. Widely available.

With some tlc of the tube(maybe a respray), you've got a nice cheap Tal 100RS !!

:smiley:

Andy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say that's a Tal 100RS from the early to mid 2000's.

a/ If it's got the deep purple-ish coating

b/ that's the early Tal RS 2" R&P focuser

:smiley:

Andy.

Ah. I stand corrected :). I'd forgotten the RS was first made with the rp focusser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update..........I've just found Astro Baby's 100rs review on the web. The logo on his 100rs looks like it could be the same one on my scope. (except that mine is painted over) Its in the same position.

There is a gold rectangular sticker at the back end which also looks like mine. Same place and same orientation. The dew shield looks identical, mine is plastic.

Biggest difference is the finder. Correct me if I'm wrong but the finder looks like it is held onto the tube with small screws whereas there are no holes in my tube but the finder attaches to the focuser. It does look like a few inches have been taken off the end, as the gold sticker is closer to the end than in Astro Baby's 100rs.

Luckily my wife doesn't read my forum sig, so I'm safe. :grin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The gold sticker looks a bit like the "don't view the sun ...." warning sticker that Broadhurst Clarkson and Fuller used to put on the scopes they sold. I seem to recall there was a version of the TAL 100 that used a Skywatcher-like R&P focuser which has an integral finder dovetail cast into it - like this scope has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You probably could hack some length off the tube and get it to focus if you have a long enough focuser drawtube. Might have some issues with the baffles inside the tube / drawtube being in the wrong positions though.

If it's been used for solar then losing a bit of the effective aperture may not have been a concern.

I'm totally confused by all of this! If you hack off the tube, but then need a longer drawtube isn't it still effective f/10? I mean, the rays are still "doing the same thing". With the same objective, the focal plane is going to be in the same place, etc.

Or am I totally off whack here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solar modding folk and someone wanting to use binoviewers might want to chop a bit off the tube.

But yes, the focal length of the lens stays the same.

Someones had a brain-puff and decided doing that makes it an F8 :D

No matter, with a bit of tlc to the paint work, you've got yourself a cheap RS !!

Congrats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm totally confused by all of this! If you hack off the tube, but then need a longer drawtube isn't it still effective f/10? I mean, the rays are still "doing the same thing". With the same objective, the focal plane is going to be in the same place, etc.

Or am I totally off whack here?

Imagine the light cone coming from the lens. Now picture moving the end of the drawtube into that cone. If you chop off enough of the ota, that drawtube is effectively entering the light cone, so your going to get viginetting, or as John says, basically cutting down the effective aperture of the lens to say maybe 90mm or so.

Andy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm totally confused by all of this! If you hack off the tube, but then need a longer drawtube isn't it still effective f/10? I mean, the rays are still "doing the same thing". With the same objective, the focal plane is going to be in the same place, etc.

Or am I totally off whack here?

Exactly what I would have thought. Perhaps they used a PST or something, who knows.

Looking at your pics Andy, it is the same scope only shorter. :laugh:

Does this make it a halfRS refractor. :grin: (think about it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.