Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Reprocessed M33 - The Triangulum Galaxy - 1100D


Gina

Recommended Posts

I think it was 10 lights of 60s at ISO 1600 with darka and flats.

While I was looking I found some later ones of M33 of 300s - I'll feed those through DSS and see what I get :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a reprocess on the other set. This is 18 lights of 300s at ISO 1600, 72 darks of 240s (not quite a match), no flats and and no biases stacked in DSS and processed in PS. Cropped and resized - saved as PNG for here.

post-13131-0-55036700-1356692140_thumb.p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting comparison. There's a lot less noise in the second and if you blink the two images it shows more contrast in the outer spiral arms. It has picked up a lot of red from somewhere though. The brighter stars are showing red halos as well. My feeling is that if you could re-balance it rather more towards the blue and reduce the dynamic range between the core and outer areas there's still more detail to come out of this.

I hope you don't mind the critique.

Andrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting comparison. There's a lot less noise in the second and if you blink the two images it shows more contrast in the outer spiral arms. It has picked up a lot of red from somewhere though. The brighter stars are showing red halos as well. My feeling is that if you could re-balance it rather more towards the blue and reduce the dynamic range between the core and outer areas there's still more detail to come out of this.

I hope you don't mind the critique.

Andrew

Thank you Andrew :) No, I'm glad of the critique :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes indeed. It makes a huge difference as well how people have their monitors setup. I post a grey scale bar image on my blog from time to time to check that folks can see the full range of brightness.

You should be very pleased with this image Gina. I've put a blink comparison here that shows this image along with your one based upon the 60 second frames. The difference is like night and day!

Andrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.